 |
Utah Administrative Code (Current through November 1, 2019) |
 |
R131. Capitol Preservation Board (State), Administration |
|
|
R131-13. Health Reform -- Health Insurance Coverage in State Contracts -- Implementation |
| R131-13-1. Purpose |
|
Latest version.
|
|
The purpose of this rule is to comply with the provisions of Section 63C-9-403. |
| R131-13-2. Authority |
|
Latest version.
|
|
This rule is authorized under Subsection 63C-9-301(3)(a) whereby the Capitol Preservation Board may make rules to govern, administer, and regulate the capitol hill complex, capitol hill facilities, and capitol hill grounds by following the procedures and requirements of Title 63G, Chapter 3, Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act, as well as Section 63C-9-403 that requires this rule related to health insurance provisions in certain design and construction contracts. |
| R131-13-3. Demonstration of Compliance |
|
Latest version.
|
|
(1) At such time as a contractor becomes subject to the requirements of section 63C-9-403, the contractor shall obtain and submit to the Executive Director a written Statement of Compliance in the form published on the website of the Utah Division of Facilities Construction and Management ("DFCM Website"). (2) At such time as a subcontractor of a contractor becomes subject to the requirements of section 63C-9-403, the contractor shall obtain from the subcontractor a written Statement of Compliance in the form published on the DFCM Website. |
| R131-13-4. Compliance Subject to Audit |
|
Latest version.
|
|
A contractor's or subcontractor's compliance with section 63C-9-403 is subject to an audit by the Capitol Preservation Board or the Office of the Legislative Auditor General. |
| R131-13-5. Penalties |
|
Latest version.
|
|
The penalties that may be imposed if a contractor or subcontractor intentionally violates the provisions of 63C-9-403 may include: (1) a three-month suspension of the contractor or subcontractor from entering into future contracts with the state upon the first violation; (2) a six-month suspension of the contractor or subcontractor from entering into future contracts with the state upon the second violation; (3) an action for debarment of the contractor or subcontractor in accordance with Section 63G-6a-904 upon the third or subsequent violation; and (4) monetary penalties which may not exceed 50% of the amount necessary to purchase qualified health insurance coverage for an employee and dependents of an employee of the contractor or subcontractor who were not offered qualified health insurance coverage during the duration of the contract. |
| R131-13-6. Benchmark available on DFCM Website |
|
Latest version.
|
|
The commercially equivalent benchmark for the qualified health insurance coverage that is provided by the Department of Health in accordance with Utah Code section 26-40-115(2) is available on the DFCM Website. |
| R131-13-7. Requirements and Procedures a Contractor Must Follow |
|
Latest version.
|
|
A contractor, including consultants and designers, must comply with the following requirements and procedures in order to demonstrate compliance with Section 63C-9-403. (1) Demonstrating Compliance with Health Insurance Requirements. A Contractor (including Design Professional) shall demonstrate compliance with Section 63C-9-403(5) (a) or (b) at the time of execution of each initial contract described in Section 63C-9-403(2). (a) The compliance is subject to an audit by the Department (Capitol Preservation Board) or the Office of the Legislative Auditor General. (b) A Contractor (including Design Professional) subject to Section 63C-9-403(2) shall demonstrate to the executive director that the Contractor has and will maintain an offer of qualified health insurance coverage for the Contractor's employees and employees' dependents. (c) Such demonstration shall be a certification on the form provided by the executive director. The form shall also require compliance with R131-13-5(2) regarding subcontractors. (d) The actuarially equivalent determination required for the qualified health insurance coverage is met by the Contractor if the Contractor provides the executive director with a written statement of actuarial equivalency attached to the certification, which is not more than one year old, regarding the contractor's offer of qualified health coverage from an actuary selected by the contractor or the contractor's insurer, or an underwriter who is responsible for developing the employer group's premium rates. The Contractor is responsible for collecting the statements as required by law from any of the subcontractors at any tier that must do so. (2) For purposes of this Rule R131-13-7, actuarially equivalency is achieved by meeting or exceeding the commercially equivalent benchmark for the qualified health insurance coverage identified in Subsection 63C-9-403(1)(c) that is provided by the department of Health, in accordance with Subsection 26-40-115(2). (3) The health insurance must be available upon the first day of the calendar month following sixty days from the date of hire. (4) Any contract subject to this Rule R131-13 shall contain a provision requiring compliance with this Rule R131-13 from the time of execution and throughout the duration of the contract. (5) Hearing and Penalties. (a) Hearing. Any hearing for any penalty under this Rule R131-13 conducted by the Board or executive director shall be conducted in the same manner as any hearing required for a suspension or debarment. (b) Penalties that may be imposed by the Board or Executive Director. The penalties that may be imposed by the Board or executive director if a contractor, consultant, subcontractor or subconsultant, at any tier, intentionally violates the provisions of Subsections (2) through (9) of 63C-9-403 include: (i) a three-month suspension of the contractor or subcontractor from entering into future contracts with the State upon the first violation, regardless of which tier the contractor or subcontractor is involved with the future design and/or construction contract; (ii) a six-month suspension of the contractor or subcontractor from entering into future contracts with the State upon the second violation, regardless of which tier the contractor or subcontractor is involved with the future design and/or construction contract; (iii) an action for debarment of the contractor or subcontractor in accordance with Section 63G-6a-904 upon the third or subsequent violation; and (iv) monetary penalties which may not exceed 50% of the amount necessary to purchase qualified health insurance coverage for an employee and dependents of an employee of the contractor or subcontractor who was not offered qualified health insurance coverage during the duration of the contract. (c)(i) In addition to the penalties imposed above, a contractor, consultant, subcontractor or subconsultant who intentionally violates the provisions of Section 63C-9-403 shall be liable to the employee for health care costs that would have been covered by qualified health insurance coverage. (ii) An employer has an affirmative defense to a cause of action under Rule R131-13-7(5)(c)(i) as provided in Subsection 63C-9-403(7)(a)(ii). An employee has a private right of action only against the employee's employer to enforce the provisions of Subsection 63C-9-403(7). |
| R131-13-8. Not Create any Contractual Relationship with any Subcontractor or Subconsultant |
|
Latest version.
|
|
Nothing in Rule R131-13 shall be construed as to create any contractual relationship whatsoever between the State, the Board, or the executive director with any subcontractor or subconsultant at any tier. |