R907-67-1. Debarment of Contractors from Work on Department Projects -- Reasons  


Latest version.
  • Debarment prevents the contractor from performing work on any department projects, either as a prime contractor or subcontractor. The department may debar a contractor, which, for purposes of this rule includes Consultants and owners, directors, managers, officers or fiscal agents of the Contractor or Consultant), from performing any work on projects that it administers if, by substantial evidence, the department concludes that one of the following factors is present;

    (1) The Contractor has been convicted of or entered a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to a crime that is related to a bid or contract-related crime in any court in the United States;

    (2) The Contractor has publicly admitted to conduct constituting a crime that is related to a bid or contract;

    (3) The Contractor has falsified information or submitted deceptive or fraudulent statements in connection with prequalification, bidding, or performance of a contract;

    (4) The Contractor has violated federal or state antitrust laws;

    (5) The Contractor has demonstrated willful wrongdoing that reflects a lack of integrity in bidding or performing a public project;

    (6) The Contractor, including a joint venture, stockholder of more than five (5) percent of the available stock, or any immediate relatives of the aforementioned has been debarred or suspended or is affiliated with any debarred or suspended person in any state or by the federal government;

    (7) The deputy director or designee concludes that the Contractor has acted in collusion with others to perform work on a project that supposedly satisfied disadvantaged business enterprise (DBE) goals or requirements through other than bona fide disadvantaged business enterprises in any combination of individuals, firms, or corporations;

    (8) The Contractor has defaulted under previous contracts;

    (9) The Contractor has performed previous or current work in an unsatisfactory manner, as determined by either the Project Manager or Resident Engineer. Among the items that can be the subject of unsatisfactory performance are the following, though there may be others that are similar in importance and require a determination of unsatisfactory performance:

    (a) noncompliance with the contract;

    (b) failure to complete work on time;

    (c) instances of substantial corrective work being needed before acceptance of the work;

    (d) instances of completed work that requires acceptance at reduced pay;

    (e) production of non-specification work or materials, and when applicable, required price reductions or corrective work;

    (f) failure to provide adequate safety measures and appropriate traffic control that endangered the safety of the work force or the public.

    (10) The Contractor has questionable moral integrity as determined by the department, the United States Attorney General, the Utah Attorney General, or any other state;

    (11) Failure to reimburse the state for monies owned on any previously awarded contract including those where the prospective bidder is a party to a joint venture and the joint venture has failed to reimburse the state for monies owed.

    (12) The deputy director or designee reasonably believes and finds that the public health, welfare, or safety require suspension.