Utah Administrative Code (Current through November 1, 2019) |
R884. Tax Commission, Property Tax |
R884-24P. Property Tax |
R884-24P-53. 2019 Valuation Guides for Valuation of Land Subject to the Farmland Assessment Act Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. Section 59-2-515
-
(1) Each year the Property Tax Division shall update and publish schedules to determine the taxable value for land subject to the Farmland Assessment Act on a per acre basis.
(a) The schedules shall be based on the productivity of the various types of agricultural land as determined through crop budgets and net rents.
(b) Proposed schedules shall be transmitted by the Property Tax Division to county assessors for comment before adoption.
(c) County assessors may not deviate from the schedules.
(d) Not all types of agricultural land exist in every county. If no taxable value is shown for a particular county in one of the tables, that classification of agricultural land does not exist in that county.
(2) All property qualifying for agricultural use assessment pursuant to Section 59-2-503 shall be assessed on a per acre basis as follows:
(a) Irrigated farmland shall be assessed under the following classifications.
(i) Irrigated I. The following counties shall assess Irrigated I property based upon the per acre values listed below:
TABLE 1
Irrigated I
1) Box Elder 677
2) Cache 582
3) Carbon 451
4) Davis 719
5) Emery 427
6) Iron 683
7) Kane 357
8) Millard 674
9) Salt Lake 616
10) Utah 641
11) Washington 557
12) Weber 694
(ii) Irrigated II. The following counties shall assess Irrigated II property based upon the per acre values listed below:
TABLE 2
Irrigated II
1) Box Elder 595
2) Cache 497
3) Carbon 359
4) Davis 633
5) Duchesne 417
6) Emery 344
7) Grand 332
8) Iron 599
9) Juab 380
10) Kane 275
11) Millard 592
12) Salt Lake 529
13) Sanpete 460
14) Sevier 484
15) Summit 393
16) Tooele 381
17) Utah 554
18) Wasatch 416
19) Washington 475
20) Weber 608
(iii) Irrigated III. The following counties shall assess Irrigated III property based upon the per acre values listed below:
TABLE 3
Irrigated III
1) Beaver 514
2) Box Elder 468
3) Cache 376
4) Carbon 239
5) Davis 509
6) Duchesne 292
7) Emery 216
8) Garfield 181
9) Grand 210
10) Iron 475
11) Juab 256
12) Kane 152
13) Millard 468
14) Morgan 328
15) Piute 285
16) Rich 152
17) Salt Lake 403
18) San Juan 146
19) Sanpete 338
20) Sevier 360
21) Summit 269
22) Tooele 255
23) Uintah 316
24) Utah 425
25) Wasatch 289
26) Washington 349
27) Wayne 281
28) Weber 483
(iv) Irrigated IV. The following counties shall assess Irrigated IV property based upon the per acre values listed below:
TABLE 4
Irrigated IV
1) Beaver 424
2) Box Elder 387
3) Cache 292
4) Carbon 153
5) Daggett 162
6) Davis 425
7) Duchesne 205
8) Emery 134
9) Garfield 97
10) Grand 127
11) Iron 389
12) Juab 170
13) Kane 68
14) Millard 380
15) Morgan 243
16) Piute 199
17) Rich 70
18) Salt Lake 312
19) San Juan 66
20) Sanpete 254
21) Sevier 276
22) Summit 185
23) Tooele 174
24) Uintah 234
25) Utah 341
26) Wasatch 206
27) Washington 263
28) Wayne 198
29) Weber 395
(b) Fruit orchards shall be assessed per acre based upon the following schedule:
TABLE 5
Fruit Orchards
1) Beaver 586
2) Box Elder 634
3) Cache 586
4) Carbon 586
5) Davis 639
6) Duchesne 586
7) Emery 586
8) Garfield 586
9) Grand 586
10) Iron 586
11) Juab 586
12) Kane 586
13) Millard 586
14) Morgan 586
15) Piute 586
16) Salt Lake 586
17) San Juan 586
18) Sanpete 586
19) Sevier 586
20) Summit 586
21) Tooele 586
22) Uintah 586
23) Utah 644
24) Wasatch 586
25) Washington 693
26) Wayne 586
27) Weber 639
(c) Meadow IV property shall be assessed per acre based upon the following schedule:
TABLE 6
Meadow IV
1) Beaver 218
2) Box Elder 216
3) Cache 223
4) Carbon 113
5) Daggett 134
6) Davis 226
7) Duchesne 143
8) Emery 118
9) Garfield 89
10) Grand 115
11) Iron 225
12) Juab 130
13) Kane 93
14) Millard 166
15) Morgan 168
16) Piute 163
17) Rich 90
18) Salt Lake 198
19) Sanpete 167
20) Sevier 172
21) Summit 173
22) Tooele 158
23) Uintah 177
24) Utah 214
25) Wasatch 179
26) Washington 195
27) Wayne 147
28) Weber 259
(d) Dry land shall be classified as one of the following two categories and shall be assessed on a per acre basis as follows:
(i) Dry III. The following counties shall assess Dry III property based upon the per acre values listed below:
TABLE 7
Dry III
1) Beaver 47
2) Box Elder 79
3) Cache 100
4) Carbon 42
5) Davis 44
6) Duchesne 47
7) Garfield 41
8) Grand 42
9) Iron 42
10) Juab 44
11) Kane 41
12) Millard 40
13) Morgan 55
14) Rich 41
15) Salt Lake 47
16) San Juan 45
17) Sanpete 47
18) Summit 41
19) Tooele 45
20) Uintah 47
21) Utah 43
22) Wasatch 41
23) Washington 41
24) Weber 68
(ii) Dry IV. The following counties shall assess Dry IV property based upon the per acre values listed below:
TABLE 8
Dry IV
1) Beaver 14
2) Box Elder 50
3) Cache 70
4) Carbon 13
5) Davis 13
6) Duchesne 16
7) Garfield 13
8) Grand 13
9) Iron 13
10) Juab 13
11) Kane 13
12) Millard 12
13) Morgan 23
14) Rich 13
15) Salt Lake 15
16) San Juan 17
17) Sanpete 16
18) Summit 13
19) Tooele 13
20) Uintah 16
21) Utah 13
22) Wasatch 13
23) Washington 12
24) Weber 38
(e) Grazing land shall be classified as one of the following four categories and shall be assessed on a per acre basis as follows:
(i) Graze 1. The following counties shall assess Graze I property based upon the per acre values listed below:
TABLE 9
GR I
1) Beaver 65
2) Box Elder 63
3) Cache 60
4) Carbon 45
5) Daggett 45
6) Davis 52
7) Duchesne 59
8) Emery 61
9) Garfield 66
10) Grand 67
11) Iron 64
12) Juab 56
13) Kane 65
14) Millard 65
15) Morgan 57
16) Piute 77
17) Rich 56
18) Salt Lake 61
19) San Juan 63
20) Sanpete 54
21) Sevier 56
22) Summit 62
23) Tooele 61
24) Uintah 69
25) Utah 56
26) Wasatch 45
27) Washington 56
28) Wayne 75
29) Weber 60
(ii) Graze II. The following counties shall assess Graze II property based upon the per acre values listed below:
TABLE 10
GR II
1) Beaver 20
2) Box Elder 20
3) Cache 19
4) Carbon 13
5) Daggett 12
6) Davis 16
7) Duchesne 16
8) Emery 18
9) Garfield 20
10) Grand 19
11) Iron 19
12) Juab 16
13) Kane 21
14) Millard 21
15) Morgan 18
16) Piute 22
17) Rich 17
18) Salt Lake 18
19) San Juan 21
20) Sanpete 15
21) Sevier 15
22) Summit 17
23) Tooele 17
24) Uintah 24
25) Utah 20
26) Wasatch 14
27) Washington 18
28) Wayne 24
29) Weber 17
(iii) Graze III. The following counties shall assess Graze III property based upon the per acre values below:
TABLE 11
GR III
1) Beaver 15
2) Box Elder 14
3) Cache 12
4) Carbon 11
5) Daggett 10
6) Davis 11
7) Duchesne 12
8) Emery 12
9) Garfield 13
10) Grand 13
11) Iron 13
12) Juab 12
13) Kane 13
14) Millard 13
15) Morgan 11
16) Piute 15
17) Rich 11
18) Salt Lake 13
19) San Juan 14
20) Sanpete 12
21) Sevier 12
22) Summit 12
23) Tooele 12
24) Uintah 16
25) Utah 12
26) Wasatch 11
27) Washington 11
28) Wayne 15
29) Weber 12
(iv) Graze IV. The following counties shall assess Graze IV property based upon the per acre values listed below:
TABLE 12
GR IV
1) Beaver 5
2) Box Elder 5
3) Cache 5
4) Carbon 5
5) Daggett 5
6) Davis 5
7) Duchesne 5
8) Emery 5
9) Garfield 5
10) Grand 5
11) Iron 5
12) Juab 5
13) Kane 5
14) Millard 5
15) Morgan 5
16) Piute 5
17) Rich 5
18) Salt Lake 5
19) San Juan 5
20) Sanpete 5
21) Sevier 5
22) Summit 5
23) Tooele 5
24) Uintah 5
25) Utah 5
26) Wasatch 5
27) Washington 5
28) Wayne 5
29) Weber 5
(f) Land classified as nonproductive shall be assessed as follows on a per acre basis:
TABLE 13
Nonproductive Land
Nonproductive Land
1) All Counties 5