R156-63b-502. Unprofessional Conduct  


Latest version.
  •   "Unprofessional conduct" includes the following:

      (1) making any statement that would reasonably cause another person to believe that an armored car security officer functions as a law enforcement officer or other official of this state or any of its political subdivisions or any agency of the federal government;

      (2) utilizing a vehicle with markings, lighting, and/or signal devices that imply or suggest that the vehicle is an authorized emergency vehicle as defined in Subsection 41-6a-102(3) and Section 41-6a-310;

      (3) utilizing a vehicle with an emergency lighting system that violates the requirements of Section 41-6a-1616 of the Utah Motor Vehicle Code;

      (4) wearing a uniform, insignia, or badge that would lead a reasonable person to believe that the armored car security officer is connected with a federal, state, or municipal law enforcement agency;

      (5) being incompetent or negligent as an armored car security officer or as an armored car company so as to cause injury to a person or create an unreasonable risk that a person might be harmed;

      (6) failing as an armored car company or its officers, directors, partners, proprietors or responsible management personnel to adequately supervise employees so as to place the public health and safety at risk;

      (7) failing to immediately notify the Division of the cancellation of the armored car company's insurance policy;

      (8) failing as an armored car company or an armored car security officer to report a criminal offense pursuant to Section R156-63b-612;

      (9) pursuant to Subsection R156-63b-612(1), failing as an armored car company or an armored car security officer to report to the Division a violation of:

      (a) any provision set forth in 18 U.S.C. Chapter 44, 922(g)1-9;

      (b) Utah Code Subsection 76-10-503(1); or

      (c) Utah Code Subsection 58-63-302(1)(h), (2)(c), or (3)(c);

      (10) wearing a uniform, insignia, or badge, or displaying a license, that would lead a reasonable person to believe that an individual is connected with an armored car company, when not employed as an armored car security officer by an armored car company; and

      (11) failing as an armored car security officer to complete required continuing education hours, in violation of Section R156-63b-304; and

      (12) failing as an armored car security company to comply with R156-63b-304(6) regarding continuing education courses or providers.