R907-65-3. Background  


Latest version.
  • The department has conducted an analysis of right-of-way values for the interstate system using current market data on (1) Utah real property values differentiated by location (northern Utah (Salt Lake City/surrounding counties), central Utah (Provo/surrounding counties), and southern Utah (Cedar City/St. George/surrounding counties), population density (urban, rural) and land use (residential, commercial, industrial, agriculture) and (2) appraisal values from department land acquisitions. These data were applied to fifteen right-of-way segments of the interstate system that the department defined based on various factors, including but not limited to location, similarity of land use, population density and number of telecommunications subscribers. Segment land values were then calculated based on the relevant "across-the-fence" property values and the following core assumptions:

    Land needed for longitudinal installations of telecommunications facilities, including a buffer zone, will generally be 6 feet in width.

    Values for preassembled right-of-way for longitudinal access are 200% of values for non-assembled right-of-way.

    Values for underground use of right-of-way for longitudinal access are 50% of values for ground level and aboveground use.

    Upper and lower bound real property values establish a valuation range for each segment. Point estimates of segment land values are calculated at the 30th percentile within this range.

    Segment land values (reported in $/ft2) are converted to $/mile using the following formula:

    Segment land value ($/mile) = Segment land value ($/ft2) x 5,280 ft/mile x easement width (6 ft).

    The fifteen segments were then grouped into five zones based on similarities in segment attributes and values. For example, the rural segments of I-15, I-70 and I-84 were grouped to create zone 1, while the urban segment of I-15 traversing Salt Lake City was grouped with I-215 to create zone 5. Similar groupings make up zones 2, 3 and 4. Through this process, the department defined five zones with a weighted average land value for each zone.

    The department then determined annual lease valuation, as a rate of return on the land values for each zone, using current market data. The department determined that a 10% annual rate of return on investment represents a fair and reasonable compensation rate in current market conditions.

    The department also received and considered recommendations on rates of compensation from the Utility in Highway Rights-of-Way Task Force pursuant to Section 6(2)(a) of S. B. 150.