Subsection R357-7-9(9) of the proposed rule permits the Board to review the economic development impact determined by an independent third party in accordance Subsection R357-7-9(5). As proposed, this review period would have run at the same time as the Board's review under Subsection R357-7-9(10) of economic development impact as reported to the Board in UCIC's annual report as required by Subsection 63N-6-301(6). Separating the timing of the Board's review of any independent third party's determination from its review of UCIC's annual report would allow review of such determination to be completed in advance of completion of the annual report. This separation of timing is consistent with the separation of the Board's review authority into Subsections R357-7-9(9) and (10). As proposed, Section R357-7-11 is the same as existing Section R357-7-11. Since the proposed rule affects changes to the other sections of Rule R357-7 to reflect the legislative changes to the VCEA under H.B. 411 (2015 General Session), the existing language of Section R357-7-11 is amended to operate consistently with the other sections of the rule. In general, the changes reflected in the comments to Section R357-7-11 do not have a substantive impact on this section's operation. The remainder of the changes are technical in nature to correct all cross-referencing in the rule to match with the incorporated changes. (DAR NOTE: This change in proposed rule has been filed to make additional changes to a proposed repeal and reenactment that was published in the January 15, 2016, issue of the Utah State Bulletin, on page 60. Underlining in the rule below indicates text that has been added since the publication of the proposed rule mentioned above; strike-out indicates text that has been deleted. You must view the change in proposed rule and the proposed amendment together to understand all of the changes that will be enforceable should the agency make this rule effective.)