No. 41550 (Amendment): Rule R33-16. Protests

(Amendment)

DAR File No.: 41550
Filed: 04/27/2017 03:57:04 PM

RULE ANALYSIS

Purpose of the rule or reason for the change:

The purpose of the changes is to bring the rule into compliance with the code. This rule is being updated in response to H.B. 398 which was enacted during the 2017 General Session. This bill amended part of the protest procedures and processes in Part 16 of the Utah Procurement Code.

Summary of the rule or change:

The changes to this rule include the removal of redundant or confusing language; the correction of citations to the Utah Procurement Code; clarification of language including updating terms used in the Procurement Code such as "relevant facts and evidence" and "deadlines"; the reorganization of and addition of subsections that explain the criteria of what does not constitute grounds for a protest; and the addition of the provision that a person without legal authority does not have standing to file a protest.

Statutory or constitutional authorization for this rule:

• Title 63G, Chapter 6a

Anticipated cost or savings to:

the state budget:

There are no anticipated costs or savings to the state budget as a result of the changes to this rule. The changes are to clarify and to remove redundant or confusing language, to clarify the procurement processes, and to bring the rule into compliance with the statutory changes.

local governments:

There are no anticipated costs or savings to the local government as a result of the changes to this rule. The changes are to clarify and to remove redundant or confusing language, to clarify the procurement processes, and to bring the rule into compliance with the statutory changes.

small businesses:

There are no anticipated costs or savings to small businesses as a result of the changes to this rule. The changes are to clarify and to remove redundant or confusing language, to clarify the procurement processes, and to bring the rule into compliance with the statutory changes.

persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local governmental entities:

There are no anticipated costs or savings to persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local governments as a result of the changes to this rule. The changes are to clarify and to remove redundant or confusing language, to clarify the procurement processes, and to bring the rule into compliance with the statutory changes.

Compliance costs for affected persons:

There are no anticipated costs to affected persons as a result of the changes to this rule. The changes are to clarify and to remove redundant or confusing language, to clarify the procurement processes, and to bring the rule into compliance with the statutory changes.

Comments by the department head on the fiscal impact the rule may have on businesses:

I have reviewed the changes to this rule and I believe that there is no potential for fiscal impact on businesses as a result of the changes to this rule. The changes are to clarify and to remove redundant or confusing language, to clarify the procurement processes, and to bring the rule into compliance with the statutory changes.

Jared Gardner, Procurement Policy Board Chair

The full text of this rule may be inspected, during regular business hours, at the Office of Administrative Rules, or at:

Administrative Services
Purchasing and General Services
Room 3150 STATE OFFICE BLDG
450 N STATE ST
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-1201

Direct questions regarding this rule to:

• Alan Bachman at the above address, by phone at 801-538-3105, by FAX at 801-538-3313, or by Internet E-mail at [e-mail]
• Kent Beers at the above address, by phone at 801-538-3143, by FAX at 801-538-3882, or by Internet E-mail at [e-mail]
• Jared Gardner at the above address, by phone at 385-646-4561, by FAX at , or by Internet E-mail at [e-mail]
• Simone Rudas at the above address, by phone at 801-538-3240, by FAX at , or by Internet E-mail at [e-mail]
• Fay Tan at the above address, by phone at 801-538-3524, by FAX at , or by Internet E-mail at [e-mail]

Interested persons may present their views on this rule by submitting written comments to the address above no later than 5:00 p.m. on:

06/14/2017

This rule may become effective on:

06/21/2017

Authorized by:

Kent Beers, Director

RULE TEXT

R33. Administrative Services, Division of Purchasing and General Services.

R33-16. Protests.

R33-16-101. Conduct.

[Controversies and protests]Protests shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements set forth in [Sections 63G-6a-1601 through 13G-6a-604]Utah Code 63G-6a, Part 16. All definitions in the Utah Procurement Code shall apply to this Rule[unless otherwise specified in this Rule]. This administrative rule provides additional requirements and procedures and must be used in conjunction with the Procurement Code.

 

R33-16-101a. Grounds for a Protest.

(1) This Rule shall apply to all protests filed under Section 63G-6a-1602.

(2) In accordance with the requirements set forth in Section 63G-6a-1602[(3)(a)(ii)], a person filing a protest must include a concise statement of the grounds upon which the protest is made.

(a) A concise statement of the grounds for a protest [should]must include the relevant facts and evidence leading the protestor to contend that a grievance has occurred, including but not limited to[specifically referencing]:

(i) An alleged violation of Utah Procurement Code 63G-6a;

(ii) An alleged violation of Title R33 or other applicable rule;

(iii) A provision of the request for proposals, invitation for bids, or other solicitation allegedly not being followed;

(iv) A provision of the solicitation alleged to be:

(A) ambiguous;

(B) confusing;

(C) contradictory;

(D) unduly restrictive;

(E) erroneous;

(F) anticompetitive; or

(G) unlawful;

(v) An alleged error made by the evaluation committee or conducting procurement unit;

(vi) An allegation of bias or discrimination by officials representing the procurement unit or the evaluation committee or an individual committee member; or

(vii) A scoring criteria allegedly not being correctly applied or calculated.

(b) "Relevant Facts and Evidence" as referred to in Section 63G-6a-1602[(3)(a)(ii)], must be specific enough to enable the protest officer to determine, if such facts and evidence are proven to be true, whether a legitimate basis for the protest exists.

(c) None of the following qualify as a concise statement of the grounds for a protest:

(i) claims made after the [opening of bids or closing date of proposals]applicable deadlines set forth in law, rule, or the solicitation document, that the specifications, terms and conditions, or other elements of a solicitation are ambiguous, confusing, contradictory, unduly restrictive, erroneous, or anticompetitive;

(ii) vague or unsubstantiated claims or allegations that do not reference specific facts and evidence including, but not limited to, vague or unsubstantiated claims or allegations [by a bidder, offeror, or prospective contractor that]such as:

(A) [a bidder, offeror, or prospective contractor ]the protestor should have received a higher score;

(B) [or that ]another [bidder, offeror, or prospective contractor ]vendor should have received a lower score;

([B]C) a service or product provided by a [bidder, offeror, or prospective contractor]protestor is better than another [bidder's, offeror's, or prospective contractor's]vendor's service or product;

([C]D) another [bidder, offeror, or prospective contractor]vendor cannot provide the procurement item for the price bid or perform the services described in the solicitation;[ or]

(E) the procurement unit's eProcruement system or other electronic procurement system:

(i) was slow, not operating properly, or was difficult to use or understand;

(ii) could not be accessed or did not allow documents to be downloaded;

(iii) did not allow a response to be submitted after the deadline for receiving responses expired;

(F) the protestor did not receive individual notice of a solicitation or was otherwise unaware of a solicitation when a procurement unit has complied with the public notice requirement in Section 63G-6a-112; or

(G) officials representing the procurement unit or the evaluation committee or an individual committee member acted in a biased or discriminatory manner against the protestor.

[(D) any item listed in Section 63G-6a-1602(3)(a)(ii) of this Rule has occurred that is not specific;]

(iii) Filing a protest requesting:

(A) a detailed explanation of the thinking and scoring of evaluation committee members, beyond the official justification statement described in Section 63G-6a-708[,]

(B) protected information beyond what is provided under the disclosure provisions of the Utah Procurement Code; or

(C) other information, documents, or explanations reasonably deemed to be not in compliance with the Utah Code or this Rule by the protest officer.

(3) Each of the claims and allegations listed in Subsection (2)(c)(ii) could serve as legitimate grounds for filing a protest if properly supported by relevant facts and evidence.

([d]4) In accordance with Section 63G-6a-1603[(1)], a protest officer may dismiss a protest if the concise statement of the grounds for filing a protest does not comply with Utah Code 63G-6a Part 16 or this Rule.

 

R33-16-201. Verification of Legal Authority.

A person filing a protest may be asked to verify that the person has legal authority to file a protest on behalf of the public or private corporation, governmental entity, sole proprietorship, partnership, or unincorporated association. A person without legal authority shall be deemed to not have standing to file a protest.

 

R33-16-301. Intervention in a Protest.

(1) Application. This Rule contains provisions applicable to intervention in a protest, including who may intervene and the time and manner of intervention.

(2) Period of Time to File. After a timely protest is filed in accordance with the Utah Procurement Code, the Protest Officer shall notify awardees of the subject procurement and may notify others of the protest. A Motion to Intervene must be filed with the Protest Officer no later than ten days from the date such notice is sent by the Protest Officer. Only those Motions to Intervene made within the time prescribed in this Rule will be considered timely. The entity or entities who conducted the procurement and those who are the intended beneficiaries of the procurement are automatically considered a Party of Record and need not file any Motion to Intervene.

(3) Contents of a Motion to Intervene. A copy of the Motion to Intervene shall also be mailed or emailed to the person protesting the procurement.

(4) Any Motion to Intervene must state, to the extent known, the position taken by the person seeking intervention and the basis in fact and law for that position. A motion to intervene must also state the person's interest in sufficient factual detail to demonstrate that:

(a) the person seeking to intervene has a right to participate which is expressly conferred by statute or by Commission rule, order, or other action;

(b) the person seeking to intervene has or represents an interest which may be directly affected by the outcome of the proceeding, including any interest as a:

(i) consumer;

(ii) customer;

(iii) competitor;

(iv) security holder of a party; or

(v) the person's participation is in the public interest.

(5) Granting of Status. If no written objection to the timely Motion to Intervene is filed with the Protest Officer within seven calendar days after the Motion to Intervene is received by the protesting person, the person seeking intervention becomes a party at the end of this seven day period. If an objection is timely filed, the person seeking intervention becomes a party only when the motion is expressly granted by the Protest Officer based on a determination that a reason for intervention exists as stated in this Rule. Notwithstanding any provision of this Rule, an awardee of the procurement that is the subject of a protest will not be denied their Motion to Intervene, regardless of its content, unless it is not timely filed with the Protest Officer.

(6) Late Motions. If a motion to intervene is not timely filed, the motion shall be denied by the Protest Officer.

 

R33-16-401. Protest Officer May Correct Noncompliance, Errors and Discrepancies.

(1) At any time during the protest process, if it is discovered that a procurement is out of compliance with any part of the Utah Procurement Code or Administrative Rules established by the applicable rule making authority, including errors or discrepancies, the protest officer, chief procurement officer, or head of a procurement unit with independent procurement authority, may take administrative action to correct or amend the procurement to bring it into compliance, correct errors or discrepancies or cancel the procurement.

 

KEY: conduct, controversies, government purchasing, protests

Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: [January 20], 2017

Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 63G-6a

---