No. 37318 (Amendment): Rule R315-17. End of Life Automotive Mercury Switch Removal Standards

(Amendment)

DAR File No.: 37318
Filed: 02/15/2013 08:23:00 AM

RULE ANALYSIS

Purpose of the rule or reason for the change:

Changes are required to conform with S.B. 21 passed during 2012 General Session (Chapter 360, Laws of Utah 2012).

Summary of the rule or change:

S.B. 21, passed during the 2012 General Session, removed some authorities from the Utah Solid and Hazardous Waste Control Board and its Executive Secretary and gave them to the Director of the Division of Solid and Hazardous Waste. This change in statute now requires changes to the Solid and Hazardous Waste rules. Specifically, references to the "Board" and the "Executive Secretary" in the rules need to be changed to "Director" as appropriate.

State statutory or constitutional authorization for this rule:

• Section 19-6-105
• Section 19-6-107
• Section 19-6-106

Anticipated cost or savings to:

the state budget:

There are no anticipated costs or savings as this amendment only changes who has authority to make regulatory decisions.

local governments:

There are no anticipated costs or savings as this amendment only changes who has authority to make regulatory decisions.

small businesses:

There are no anticipated costs or savings as this amendment only changes who has authority to make regulatory decisions.

persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local governmental entities:

There are no anticipated costs or savings as this amendment only changes who has authority to make regulatory decisions.

Compliance costs for affected persons:

There are no compliance costs for affected persons as this amendment only changes who has authority to make regulatory decisions.

Comments by the department head on the fiscal impact the rule may have on businesses:

There is no anticipated fiscal impact on businesses as this amendment only changes who has authority to make regulatory decisions.

Amanda Smith, Executive Director

The full text of this rule may be inspected, during regular business hours, at the Division of Administrative Rules, or at:

Environmental Quality
Solid and Hazardous WasteRoom Second Floor
195 N 1950 W
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-3097

Direct questions regarding this rule to:

• Allan Moore at the above address, by phone at 801-536-0211, by FAX at 801-536-0222, or by Internet E-mail at [e-mail]
• Tina Mercer at the above address, by phone at 801-536-0259, by FAX at 801-536-0222, or by Internet E-mail at [e-mail]

Interested persons may present their views on this rule by submitting written comments to the address above no later than 5:00 p.m. on:

04/01/2013

This rule may become effective on:

04/15/2013

Authorized by:

Scott Anderson, Director

RULE TEXT

R315. Environmental Quality, Solid and Hazardous Waste.

R315-17. End of Life Automotive Mercury Switch Removal Standards.

R315-17-4. Mercury Switch Collection Plan.

(a) Manufacturers of any vehicle sold within the State of Utah shall submit a plan individually or in cooperation with other manufacturers to the [Executive Secretary of the Utah Solid and Hazardous Waste Control Board]Director for review and approval by January 15, 2007. This submission shall be accompanied by a filing fee as established by the legislature in the Department of Environmental Quality fee schedule. The [Executive Secretary]Director shall bill the responsible party for review of plans submitted to meet the requirements of this Rule.

(b) The [Executive Secretary]Director shall review and approve or disapprove the submitted plan based on the requirements outlined in R315-7-17-4(d). If the plan is not approved, the [Executive Secretary]Director shall provide comments to the manufacturer within 60 days of submission of the plan. The manufacturer shall address all comments from the [Executive Secretary]Director and submit an amended plan within 90 days after the [Executive Secretary]Director provides comments on the unapproved plan.

(c) A manufacturer shall ensure that plan implementation occurs by July 1, 2007.

(d) The mercury switch collection plan shall include:

(1) The make, model, and year of any vehicle, including current and anticipated future production models, sold by a manufacturer that may contain one or more mercury switches;

(2) The description and location of each mercury switch for each make, model, and year of vehicle;

(3) Procedures for the prompt reimbursement by a manufacturer of costs incurred by a person removing and collecting mercury switches without regard to the date on which the mercury switch is removed and collected;

(4) Information addressing safe and environmentally sound methods for mercury switch removal and information about hazards related to mercury and the proper handling of mercury;

(5) Methods for the storage and disposal of mercury switches, including packaging and shipping of mercury switches to an authorized recycling, storage, or disposal facility; and

(6) Procedures for the transfer of information among persons involved with the plan to comply with reporting requirements.

(e) If a manufacturer does not know or is uncertain about whether or not a switch contains mercury, the plan shall presume that the switch contains mercury.

 

R315-17-6. Public Participation.

The [Executive Secretary]Director shall also provide public notice, a public comment period, and public hearing(s) for each proposed Mercury Switch Collection Plan in accordance with R315-4-1.10 through R315-4-1.12 and R315-4-1.17.

 

R315-17-7. Plan Amendments.

The [Executive Secretary]Director may require a manufacturer to modify the plan at any time upon finding that an approved plan as implemented has failed to meet the requirements of this rule.

 

R315-17-8. Reporting Requirements.

(a) Each manufacturer that is required to implement a mercury switch collection plan shall submit, either individually or in cooperation with other manufacturers, an annual report on the plan's implementation to the [Executive Secretary]Director by October 1 of each year, beginning in 2008.

(b) The annual report shall include:

(1) The number of mercury switches collected;

(2) The number of mercury switches for which the manufacturer has provided reimbursement;

(3) A description of the successes and failures of the plan;

(4) A discussion of how the failures of the plan have been or will be corrected; and

(5) A statement detailing the costs required to implement the plan.

 

KEY: hazardous waste

Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: [December 1, 2006]2013

Notice of Continuation: July 13, 2011

Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 9-6-1003

 

---