No. 36325 (Repeal): Rule R202-100. Community Services Block Grant Rules

(Repeal)

DAR File No.: 36325
Filed: 06/05/2012 02:09:58 PM

RULE ANALYSIS

Purpose of the rule or reason for the change:

H.B. 139 (Department of Community and Culture Amendments) passed in the 2012 Legislative General session. The intent of this bill was to restructure the Department of Community and Culture into the new Department of Heritage and Arts, and to move the Housing and Community Development, Community Services Division to the Department of Workforce Services (DWS). The purpose of this repeal is to remove this rule as the content is now under DWS. (DAR NOTE: The proposed new rule is R990-100 published in the June 1, 2012, issue of the Bulletin under DAR No. 36221.)

Summary of the rule or change:

This rule is repealed in its entirety.

State statutory or constitutional authorization for this rule:

• Title 35A, Chapter 8

Anticipated cost or savings to:

the state budget:

There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed repeal. Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.

local governments:

There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed repeal. Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.

small businesses:

There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed repeal. Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.

persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local governmental entities:

There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed repeal. Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.

Compliance costs for affected persons:

There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed repeal. Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.

Comments by the department head on the fiscal impact the rule may have on businesses:

There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed repeal. Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.

Julie Fisher, Executive Director

The full text of this rule may be inspected, during regular business hours, at the Division of Administrative Rules, or at:

Community and Culture
Housing and Community Development, Community ServicesRoom 500
324 S STATE ST
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-2388

Direct questions regarding this rule to:

• Jonathan Hardy at the above address, by phone at 801-538-8650, by FAX at 801-538-8888, or by Internet E-mail at [e-mail]

Interested persons may present their views on this rule by submitting written comments to the address above no later than 5:00 p.m. on:

08/01/2012

This rule may become effective on:

08/15/2012

Authorized by:

Michael Hansen, Deputy Director

RULE TEXT

[R202. Community and Culture, Housing and Community Development, Community Services.

R202-100. Community Services Block Grant Rules.

R202-100-1. Authority.

This rule is authorized under Section 9-4-202, U.C.A. 1953, which allows the Department of Community and Culture (DCC) to receive funds for and to administer federal aid programs.

 

R202-100-2. Purpose.

The purpose of this rule is to establish standards and procedures for the Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) authorized under the Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1981 (Title XVII, Chapter 2, Sections 671 through 683), contracted to eligible entities (counties or combinations of counties and Community Action Programs) to provide a range of services and activities having a measurable and potentially major impact on causes of poverty in the local communities.

 

R202-100-3. Eligible Grantees for CSBG Programs and Projects.

A. Utah shall distribute at least 90 percent of available funds as pass-through grants to eligible entities (hereinafter referred to as local grantees) for them to administer directly or, at their option, to sub-contract (hereinafter referred to as local sub-grantees) for the performance of eligible activities. Eligibility for the 5 percent discretionary funds will be established by the state plan each fiscal year.

B. Whenever a public grantee chooses to sub-contract all program operations to a private entity rather than administer them directly, the private entity must be a non-profit organization directed by a board whose composition complies with Section 675 (c)(3) of the Community Services Block Grant Act.

 

R202-100-4. Assurances Required by CSBG Act.

All grantees shall be required to submit a certification of assurances based on CSBG programmatic, administrative and financial requirements of the Act as outlined by Community Services Block Grant Program Directives prepared by the State Community Services Office (SCSO).

 

R202-100-5. Compliance.

Local grantees must maintain their eligibility to receive CSBG funds by being in compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and contractual agreements. The state reserves the right to examine all aspects of CSBG funded activities to ensure that this is the case.

 

R202-100-6. Qualifications.

Local grantees must demonstrate that they have in place, or shall have in place prior to undertaking CSBG funded program activities, management systems adequate to ensure that CSBG funds shall be spent efficiently and effectively. When activities are sub-contracted, the local grantee must have in place a system and assume the responsibility for monitoring and evaluating sub-contracts. Files must be retained containing such monitoring and evaluation results. In no case shall the state provide funds to a grantee if available evidence suggests that the grantee cannot fulfill its obligations under the terms of the assurances required by the CSBG Act and the state plan for the use of CSBG funds.

 

R202-100-7. Program Participant Eligibility.

Income eligibility for program participation shall be based on the Office of Management and Budget official poverty guidelines as described in Section 673 of the CSBG Act.

 

R202-100-8. Funds Allocation.

A. CSBG funds shall be allocated on the basis of federal fiscal years beginning October 1 to local agencies by the following formula:

(1) All agencies selected for funding shall be awarded an equal, minimum base amount.

(2) The amount remaining after subtraction of the sum of the minimum base amount shall be allocated among the local grantees based on the census counts (or updates) of low-income residents and other related criteria such as long-term unemployment.

 

R202-100-9. Approval Process.

Criteria shall be used to review applications for CSBG funds and shall be distributed to eligible grantees as a SCSO Community Services Block Grant Program Directives. A panel will screen and give a numerical rating to every application submitted by an eligible grantee based on the criteria outlined. The Community Services Office will compile these ratings and will make a final determination as to proposals that will receive funding and as to the level of funding that will be provided. Proposals must score a minimum number of points to be considered eligible. Prospective CSBG grantees shall be notified of application status 60 days or less after the closing date of application submissions. Any application found to be incomplete or inadequate will be returned to the local grantee for appropriate changes. The Community Services Office will provide technical assistance to any eligible agency scoring below the minimum.

 

R202-100-10. Award Procedures.

The state shall enter into a contract with local grantees October 1 contingent upon Federal authorization and appropriation for CSBG. Once signed, this contract shall be binding on both parties.

 

R202-100-11. Fiscal Operations Procedures.

A. Each local grantee shall have an acceptable procedure describing functions of its fiscal office and including at a minimum:

(1) Purchasing procedure

(2) System of cash control

(3) Payroll system

(4) Internal and external reporting systems

B. Fiscal procedures shall be in compliance with applicable state and federal regulations and conform with generally accepted accounting procedures.

 

R202-100-12. Financial Reports and Reimbursements.

Financial reports (Form CSBG 611-D) are to be submitted on a monthly basis, no later than twenty (20) days following the end of each month. Local grantees shall receive reimbursement based on a monthly financial status report and certification of work program activities. All reports must have an authorized signature, i.e., the contract signatory or someone designated by the signatory, with a letter of designation filed with the state.

 

R202-100-13. Administrative Cost.

Administrative costs include allowable expenditures incurred to administer the CSBG through an indirect cost plan, approved by a cognizant Federal Agency or a cost allocation plan approved by the SCSO. Such costs should not exceed 10%.

 

R202-100-14. Travel and Per Diem.

Travel, per diem and allowances for staff and board members shall be determined by approved local agency guidelines which establish rates of reimbursement.

 

R202-100-15. Purchasing, Receiving and Accounts Payable.

A. Grantee agencies shall develop and have approved procedures for handling purchasing, receiving, and accounts payable. (In the absence of a local procedure, the state procedure shall be followed.) These procedures should include:

(1) Pre-numbered purchase orders and/or vouchers for all items of cost and expense.

(2) Procedures to insure procurement at competitive prices.

(3) Receiving reports to control the receipt of merchandise.

(4) Effective review following prescribed procedures for program coding, pricing and extending vendors' invoices.

(5) Invoices matched with purchase orders and receiving reports.

(6) The local grantee must have adequate controls, such as checklists for statement - closing procedures to insure that open invoices and uninvolved amounts for goods and services are properly accrued or recorded in the books or controlled through worksheet entries.

(7) Adequate segregation of duties in that different individuals are responsible for:

(a) Purchase;

(b) Receipt of merchandise or services; and

(c) Voucher approval

B. A list of anticipated equipment purchases must accompany the application for funding. Purchases over $1,000 must receive written state approval.

 

R202-100-16. Property and Equipment.

A. Each local grantee shall develop procedures for control of property and equipment. These procedures should include; but are not limited to:

(1) An effective system of authorization and approval of equipment purchase;

(2) Accounting practices for recording assets;

(3) Detailed records of individual assets which are maintained and periodically balanced with the general ledger accounts;

(4) Effective procedures for authorizing and accounting for equipment disposal; and

(5) Secure storage of property and equipment.

 

R202-100-17. Purchase or Improvement of Land or Buildings.

Funds shall not be used for purchase or improvement of land, or the purchase, construction, or permanent improvement (other than low-cost residential weatherization or other energy related home repairs) of any building or other facility except as this prohibition may be waived under conditions described in Section 680 (b) of the CSBG act.

 

R202-100-18. Personnel Policies.

A. Each local grantee shall maintain written personnel policies, available for review, which should include:

(1) Classification and pay plan;

(2) Policies governing selection and appointment;

(3) Conditions of employment and employee performance;

(4) Employee benefits;

(5) Employee-management relations including procedures for filing and handling grievances, complaints and rights of appeal;

(6) Personnel records and payroll procedures;

(7) Job description for all positions;

(8) Drug Free Work Place Policy.

 

R202-100-19. Civil Rights.

A. All CSBG funded programs shall comply with the nondiscrimination provisions contained in Section 677 of the Community Services Act.

B. Local grantees shall be required to have on file an affirmative action plan that describes what they will do to ensure that current and prospective employees and program participants are treated in a non-discriminatory manner. This plan shall also include a grievance procedure to deal with allegations of discrimination on the part of prospective and current staff members or program participants.

C. The provisions of this section shall apply to any and all grantees and sub-grantees, except where special conditions apply, i.e., Indians, migrants, or seasonal farm workers.

 

R202-100-20. Prohibition of Political Activities.

Each CSBG grantee shall be responsible for assuring adherence to political activity prohibitions contained in Sec. 675 (c) (7) of the CSBG Act. Monitoring of sub-grantees shall be required as a part of administrative responsibilities. A description of this process is to be available for state review during monitoring visits or upon request. Violations of the prohibitions are to be reported to the state CSO immediately along with reports of measures taken by the grantee to restore compliance.

 

R202-100-21. Audits and Inspection.

Each local grantee shall have performed by an independent certified public accounting firm an annual audit that conforms with the provisions and requirements of OMB Circular A-128, A-122 and A-133. The audit shall be due no later than one year following the end of the grantee's fiscal year.

 

R202-100-22. Suspension or Termination of Funds.

A. DCC may suspend funding to a local grantee if monitoring reports or independent audit reports indicate continuing, substantial non-compliance with contract requirements, accounting procedures, or fiscal control requirements. If problems identified are not corrected within a reasonable length of time, but not to exceed 60 days, DCC may terminate its contract with local grantee and make the remaining funds available to other eligible entities. Action to suspend or terminate funding will not be taken, however, unless timely and reasonable communication with the local grantee fails to produce corrective action to DCC's satisfaction. The local grantee shall not be relieved of liability to the state for funds expended for improper purpose or federal audit exceptions sustained by the state by virtue of any breach of the contract by the agency, and the state may withhold or recover any payments to the grantee for the purpose of setoff until such time as the exact amount of damage due the state from the grantee is determined.

B. Pursuant to the provisions of the contract between the state and local grantee, delegation of funds and activities to others may not be made without prior approval of DCC, SCSO.

 

R202-100-23. Transfer of Funds.

Because of the limited funds anticipated to be made available, DCC shall not transfer any of the CSBG to eligible entities under the Older Americans Act of 1965, Head Start, or Low-income Home Energy Assistance, nor consider a grantee in compliance if such transfers are made locally.

 

R202-100-24. Amendments/Waivers.

A. Prior approval for budget changes is required in the following instances:

(1) The dollar amount of transfers among budget categories exceeds or is expected to exceed $10,000 or five percent of the grant budget, whichever is greater, for grants of $100,000 or larger.

(2) For grants under $100,000, approval is required if transfers exceed or are expected to exceed five percent of the grant budget.

(3) Limited flexibility in budget adjustments will be allowed as follows (submit informational copies of adjusted CSBG forms to SCSO):

(a) Rebudgeted funds within the Personnel Services portion of their CSBG budget;

(b) Rebudgeted funds within the Supportive Services portion of their CSBG budget;

(c) On a one-time basis, allowable transfers from the Personnel Services budget to Supportive Services;

(d) On a one-time basis, allowable transfers from the Supportive Services budget to Personnel Services;

B. Program goals may be amended by submitting changes for approval on appropriate CSBG forms. At any point during the program year it appears that a goal may be achieved at less than 90%, a program and budget amendment must be submitted for approval.

C. Grantees may also request contract period end dates be extended for up to sixty (60) days in order to spend program or project carryover funds amounting to less than ten (10) percent, or an amount approved by the state, of the total contract amount.

 

R202-100-25. Project Monitoring and Evaluations.

A. Monitoring will be accomplished through review of the fiscal and progress reports and on-site. On-site visits shall automatically be initiated in response to a written complaint of financial or programmatic non-compliance.

B. Evaluation of CSBG funded programs shall be conducted either by the state or by the local CSBG grantees and shall be distinct from both compliance monitoring and the state's examination of CSBG grantees to ensure that they are eligible to receive CSBG funds and that they are in compliance with all CSBG related obligations. Monitoring will relate to grantee compliance with federal assurances and state requirements in program management and operation. Evaluation will involve an attempt to measure program performance project results, and to determine the impact a grantee's efforts have had on the causes of a problem being addressed and on the problem itself.

C. For the most part, CSBG evaluations will be a joint state/local effort, but the state does reserve the right to conduct evaluations of CSBG programs at any time for purposes it deems appropriate. In such cases, reasonable efforts will be made to accommodate the concerns of any local grantee that is involved.

 

R202-100-26. Program Reporting Requirements.

Local grantees shall be required to maintain client profile sheets on individual clients, households or groups of clients, if appropriate. A compiled report of the number and characteristics of clients served, by category, shall be submitted to SCSO on the prescribed CSBG Form thirty (30) days after the end of each quarter of the program period. The program progress report is also due at the same time.

 

R202-100-27. Appeals Procedure.

A. Grantees identified in the state plan as eligible to receive funding from the Community Services Block Grant can use the following procedure to appeal decisions made by the State Community Services Office in regards to program and funding.

B. Any substantive decision of SCSO which a local grantee believes to be unfair or unreasonable and having a major adverse impact on the local program, may be appealed by the grantee. The appeal process is as follows:

(1) Within fifteen (15) days of receipt of a SCSO decision that is believed to be unfair or unreasonable, the grantee believing itself to be aggrieved must submit a letter to the executive director of DCC, approved and signed by its elected officials, setting forth:

(a) The decision that is being questioned;

(b) The date on which the grantee received notice of the decision;

(c) The rationale of the grantee for considering the decision to be substantial and unfair or unreasonable to the grantee;

(d) A request for a hearing, including a statement as to the desired outcome of such a hearing.

(2) Within ten (10) working days of the receipt of the grantee's request for a hearing, the executive director shall name a hearing officer, who shall schedule a hearing date no later than two (2) weeks after being so named and will notify the appellant grantee. The hearing officer will be independent of DCC.

(3) Prior to the scheduled hearing, the SCSO staff shall contact the Board of Directors of the appellant grantee:

(a) To obtain additional information pertinent to the issue;

(b) To clarify any misunderstanding of fact or policy;

(c) To explore possible alternatives that would eliminate the necessity for a hearing;

(d) To obtain a written withdrawal of the request for a hearing if the issue is resolved through negotiation.

(4) The hearing, should there be one, shall be conducted by the hearing officer. The appellant grantee may be represented by whomever it chooses at the hearing, but must notify DCC at least five (5) working days prior to the hearing who that person will be.

(5) The hearing officer shall review all testimony and evidence presented at the hearing and recommend a decision to the DCC Executive Director. The DCC Executive Director shall issue a written decision on the appeal within 10 working days after receipt of the hearing officer's recommendations.

(6) The decision resulting from the hearing shall be final. Any necessary hearings shall be held in Salt Lake City or at a site more convenient to the appellant agency, at the discretion of the Executive Director of DCC.

 

R202-100-28. Citizen Participation.

A. The state requires citizen participation and supports maximum participation of all interested persons and groups in the development and implementation of the CSBG programs at the state and local level, in advisory or administering capacity.

1. Tripartite boards are required for governing boards of private, non-profit organizations and for the administering/advisory boards of public agencies and shall conform to the requirements outlined in Sec. 675 (c) (3).

a. A minimum of one third of the board is to represent low income. A description of the democratic selection process for representatives of the poor is to be available for review.

b. One third of the members of the board are to be elected public officials, currently holding office, or their representatives, except if not enough public officials are willing or available, appointed public officials may serve. Minutes of meetings or letters of appointment must be on file for review.

c. The remainder of the members are to be officials or members of business, industry, labor, religious, welfare, education or other major groups in the community. A description of the process used for selection of private sector representatives is to be available for review. The description should include a process for interested private sector groups to petition for membership and how the petition will be considered.

B. As a part of the problem assessment portion of the planning phase (conducted every three years), each local agency shall conduct public forums for low-income residents of the areas. These forums are to allow a discussion and listing of problems as viewed by the low-income and their suggestions for solutions.

 

R202-100-29. Federal Program Regulations.

The CSBG is subject to regulations periodically published in the Federal Register.

 

R202-100-30. Required Documentation and Forms.

The required application, budget and reporting forms shall be designated through SCSO Community Services Block Grant Program Directives.

 

R202-100-31. Application Process and Submission Timetable.

A. The grant application phase of CSBG for local grantees involves:

(1) A local poverty problem identification process developed under prescribed criteria outlined in a Community Services Block Grant Program Directives, problem analysis, resource analysis, service delivery system description, prioritization process and coordination policy process with appropriate documentation submitted to SCSO by May 15 every three (3) years, starting in 1998;

(2) The development of a work program for addressing problems identified and prioritized includes;

(a) Community review of draft work program;

(b) Approval of final plan by local boards or by local officials;

(c) Submission to state office by June 30 of each year.

(3) As part of the application package, the applicant must submit an administrative budget separate from the program operation budget.

 

R202-100-32. Budget Estimate.

By May 1, the state shall make available to eligible applicants, an estimate of funding amounts for each geographical area, based on the formula contained in the State Plan.

 

R202-100-33. Public Review and Comment.

A. After the work program has been prepared, but before Board approval, the applicant must provide ample opportunity for its' review by low-income residents, the community as a whole, and relevant community organizations and agencies. Notice of the availability of the application for citizen review and comment shall also be given by providing written notice to organizations and agencies, to the local media, and posting of notice in public places convenient to low-income residents. The grantee must submit all of the comments of persons and organizations choosing to respond with the application to the State Office of Community Services.

 

R202-100-34. Senate Bill 50 - Sales Tax Refund on Donated Food.

A. The State Community Services Office shall:

(1) Provide definitions for certification and de-certification of eligible agencies to receive the sales tax refund;

(2) Provide criteria for an organization to apply for recognition as a qualified emergency food agency;

(3) Provide procedures to be used in the certifying and de-certifying of agencies for Rules and Procedure infractions;

(4) Provide standards for determining and verifying the amount of the donated food;

(5) Certify organizations to receive the Sales Tax Refund to the State Tax Commission;

(6) Provide monitoring to insure certified agencies maintain required weighing capabilities and inventory records;

(7) Develop other procedures necessary to implement Senate Bill 50 in consultation with the State Tax Commission.

 

KEY: antipoverty programs, grants, community action programs, food sales tax refunds

Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: January 15, 1998

Notice of Continuation: November 7, 2007

Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 9-4-202]

 

---