No. 39386 (New Rule): Rule R277-204. Utah Professional Practices Advisory Commission Criminal Background Review

(New Rule)

DAR File No.: 39386
Filed: 05/15/2015 08:59:13 AM

RULE ANALYSIS

Purpose of the rule or reason for the change:

H.B. 345, Education Abuse Policy, 2015 General Session, changed the rulemaking authority from the Utah Professional Practices Advisory Commission (UPPAC) to the Utah State Board of Education. Rule R277-204 is created in response to the legislation and because UPPAC rules (Title R686) are being repealed. (DAR NOTE: The proposed repeal of Rule R686-100 under DAR No. 39389, Rule R686-101 under DAR No. 39390, Rule R686-102 under DAR No. 39391, Rule R686-103 under DAR No. 39392, Rule R686-104 under DAR No. 39393, and Rule R686-105 under DAR No. 39394 are in this issue, June 1, 2015, of the Bulletin.).

Summary of the rule or change:

Rule R277-204 establishes procedures for an applicant to proceed toward licensing or be denied to continue toward a license when an application or recommendation for licensing or renewal identifies offenses in the applicant's criminal background check.

State statutory or constitutional authorization for this rule:

• Art X Sec 3
• Section 53A-6-306
• Subsection 53A-1-401(3)

Anticipated cost or savings to:

the state budget:

It is anticipated that there is likely no cost or savings to the state budget. Procedures in this rule are similar to procedures in Rule R686-103.

local governments:

It is anticipated that there is likely no cost or savings to local government. Procedures in this rule are similar to procedures in Rule R686-103.

small businesses:

It is anticipated that there is likely no cost or savings to small businesses. Procedures in this rule are similar to procedures in Rule R686-103.

persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local governmental entities:

It is anticipated that there is likely no cost or savings to persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities. Procedures in this rule are similar to procedures in Rule R686-103.

Compliance costs for affected persons:

There are likely no compliance costs for affected persons. Procedures in this rule are similar to procedures in Rule R686-103.

Comments by the department head on the fiscal impact the rule may have on businesses:

I have reviewed this rule and I believe that there is likely no fiscal impact on businesses.

Brad C. Smith, State Superintendent

The full text of this rule may be inspected, during regular business hours, at the Division of Administrative Rules, or at:

Education
Administration
250 E 500 S
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-3272

Direct questions regarding this rule to:

• Benjamin Rasmussen at the above address, by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at [e-mail]

Interested persons may present their views on this rule by submitting written comments to the address above no later than 5:00 p.m. on:

07/01/2015

This rule may become effective on:

07/08/2015

Authorized by:

Angela Stallings, Associate Superintendent, Policy and Communication

RULE TEXT

R277. Education, Administration.

R277-204. Utah Professional Practices Advisory Commission Criminal Background Review.

R277-204-1. Authority and Purpose.

A. This rule is authorized under Utah Constitution Article X, Section 3 which vests general control and supervision over public education in the Board, by Section 53A-6-306 which directs the Board to adopt rules regarding UPPAC duties and procedures, and by Section 53A-1-401(3) which allows the Board to adopt rules in accordance with its responsibilities.

B. The purpose of this rule is to establish procedures for an applicant to proceed toward licensing or be denied to continue when an application or recommendation for licensing or renewal identifies offenses in the applicant's criminal background check.

C. The standards and procedures of the Utah Administrative Procedures Act do not apply to this rule under the exemption of Section 63G-4-102(2)(d).

 

R277-204-2. Initial Submission and Evaluation of Information.

A. The Executive Secretary shall review all information received as part of a criminal background review.

B. The Executive Secretary may request any of the following information from an educator in determining how to process a criminal background review:

(1) a letter of explanation for each reported offense that details the circumstances, the final disposition, and any explanation for the offense the applicant may want to provide UPPAC, including any advocacy for approving licensing;

(2) official documentation regarding each offense, including court records and police reports for each offense, or if both court records and police reports are not available, a letter on official police or court stationery from the appropriate court or police department involved, explaining why the records are not available; and

(3) any other information that the Executive Secretary considers relevant under the circumstances in a criminal background review.

C(1) The Executive Secretary may only process a criminal background review after receipt of all letters of explanation and documentation requested in good faith by the Executive Secretary.

(2) The Executive Secretary shall provide timely notice if the information provided by an applicant is incomplete.

D. If an applicant is under court supervision of any kind, including parole, informal or formal probation, or plea in abeyance, the Executive Secretary may not process the background check review until the Executive Secretary receives proof that court supervision has terminated.

E. It is the applicant's sole responsibility to provide any requested material to the Executive Secretary.

F. The Executive Secretary shall process criminal background reviews subject to the following criteria:

(1) the Executive Secretary may clear a criminal background review without further action if the arrest, citation, or charge resulted in a dismissal, unless the dismissal resulted from a plea in abeyance agreement;

(2) the Executive Secretary shall forward a recommendation to clear the following criminal background reviews directly to the Board:

(a) singular offenses committed by an applicant, excluding offenses identified in R277-204-2F(3), if the arrest occurred more than two years prior to the date of submission to UPPAC for review;

(b) more than two offenses committed by the applicant, excluding offenses identified in R277-204-2F(3), if at least one arrest occurred more than five years prior to the date of submission to UPPAC for review; or

(c) more than two offenses committed by the applicant, excluding offenses identified in R277-204-2F(3), if all arrests for the offenses occurred more than 10 years prior to the date of submission to UPPAC for review;

(3) the Executive Secretary shall forward the following criminal background reviews to UPPAC, which shall make a recommendation to the Board for final action:

(a) convictions or pleas in abeyance for any offense where the offense date occurred less than two years prior to the date of submission to UPPAC;

(b) convictions or pleas in abeyance for multiple offenses where all offenses occurred less than five years prior to the date of submission to UPPAC;

(c) convictions or pleas in abeyance for felonies;

(d) arrests, convictions, or pleas in abeyance for sex-related or lewdness offenses;

(e) convictions or pleas in abeyance for alcohol-related offenses or drug-related offenses where the offense date was less than five years prior to the date of submission to UPPAC;

(f) convictions or pleas in abeyance involving children in any way; and

(g) convictions or pleas in abeyance involving any other matter which the Executive Secretary determines, in his discretion, warrants review by UPPAC and the Board; and

(4) If the criminal background review involves a conviction for an offense requiring mandatory revocation under 53A-6-501(5)(b) or meeting the definition of sex offender under 77-41-102(16), the Executive Secretary shall forward a recommendation directly to the Board that clearance be denied.

G. The Executive Secretary shall use reasonable discretion to interpret the information received from the Bureau of Criminal Identification to comply with the provisions of this rule.

H. In Board review of recommendations of the Executive Secretary and UPPAC for criminal background checks, the following shall apply:

(1) the Board may uphold any recommendation of the Executive Secretary or UPPAC, which action shall be the final agency action of USOE;

(2) the Board may substitute its own judgment in lieu of the recommendation of the Executive Secretary or UPPAC, which action shall be the final agency action of USOE; and

(3) if the Board chooses to substitute its own judgment in a criminal background review, the Board shall adopt findings articulating its reasoning.

I. If a criminal background review arises as a result of conduct that was cleared in a prior criminal background review by the Executive Secretary, UPPAC, or the Board, the prior action shall be deemed final, and the Executive Secretary shall clear the criminal background review.

J. If a criminal background review results in an applicant's denial, the applicant may request to be heard, and to have the matter reconsidered by the Board, consistent with the requirements of Section 53A-15-1506(1)(c).

 

KEY: educator license, background review, background check

Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: 2015

Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: Art X Sec 3; 53A-6-306; 53A-1-401(3)

 

---