No. 37537 (Amendment): Section R277-531-3. Public Educator Evaluation Framework

(Amendment)

DAR File No.: 37537
Filed: 04/24/2013 01:02:08 PM

RULE ANALYSIS

Purpose of the rule or reason for the change:

This rule is amended to provide minor wording changes to make the language consistent with the intent of the state law.

Summary of the rule or change:

In Subsection R277-531-3F(8), "process" is changed to "procedure" and "conclusions" is changed to "process".

State statutory or constitutional authorization for this rule:

• Subsection s53A-1-402(1)(a)(i)
• Subsection 53A-1-401(3)

Anticipated cost or savings to:

the state budget:

There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state budget. The wording changes make the language consistent with the intent of the state law.

local governments:

There is no anticipated cost or savings to local government. The wording changes make the language consistent with the intent of the state law.

small businesses:

There is no anticipated cost or savings to small businesses. This rule and the amendments apply to public education and do not affect businesses.

persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local governmental entities:

There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities. The wording changes make the language consistent with the intent of the state law.

Compliance costs for affected persons:

There are no compliance costs for affected persons. The wording changes make the language consistent with the intent of the state law.

Comments by the department head on the fiscal impact the rule may have on businesses:

I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact on businesses.

Martell Menlove, State Superintendent

The full text of this rule may be inspected, during regular business hours, at the Division of Administrative Rules, or at:

Education
Administration
250 E 500 S
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-3272

Direct questions regarding this rule to:

• Carol Lear at the above address, by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at [e-mail]

Interested persons may present their views on this rule by submitting written comments to the address above no later than 5:00 p.m. on:

06/14/2013

This rule may become effective on:

06/21/2013

Authorized by:

Carol Lear, Director, School Law and Legislation

RULE TEXT

R277. Education, Administration.

R277-531. Public Educator Evaluation Requirements (PEER).

R277-531-3. Public Educator Evaluation Framework.

A. The Board shall provide a framework that includes five general evaluation system areas and additional discretionary components of an LEA's educator evaluation system.

B. Alignment with Board expectations and standards and required consistency of LEA policies with evaluation process:

(1) An LEA educator evaluation system shall be based on rigorous performance expectations aligned with R277-530.

(2) An LEA evaluation system shall establish and articulate performance expectations individually for all licensed LEA educators.

(3) An LEA evaluation system shall include valid and reliable measurement tools including, at a minimum:

(a) observations of instructional quality;

(b) evidence of student growth;

(c) parent and student input; and

(d) other indicators as determined by the LEA.

(4) An LEA evaluation system shall provide a summative yearly rating of educator performance using uniform statewide terminology and definitions. An LEA evaluation system shall include summative and formative components.

(5) An LEA evaluation system shall direct the revision or alignment of all related LEA policies, as necessary, to be consistent with the LEA Educator Evaluation System.

C. Valid and reliable tools:

(1) An LEA evaluation system shall use valid, reliable and research-based measurement tool(s) for all educator evaluations. Such measurements:

(a) employ a variety of measurement tools;

(b) adopt differentiated methodologies for measuring student growth for educators in subject areas for which standardized tests are available and in subject areas for which standardized tests are not available;

(c) provide evaluation for non-instructional licensed educators and administrators;

(2) shall provide for both formative and summative evaluation data;

(3) data gathered from tools may be considered by an LEA to inform decisions about employment and professional development.

D. Discussion, collaboration and protection of confidentiality with educators regarding evaluation process:

(1) An LEA evaluation system shall provide for clear and timely notice to educators of the components, timelines and consequences of the evaluation process.

(2) An LEA evaluation system shall provide for timely discussion with evaluated educators to include professional growth plans as required in R277-501 and evaluation conferences.

(3) An LEA evaluation system shall protect personal data gathered in the evaluation process.

E. Support for instructional improvement:

(1) An LEA evaluation system shall assess professional development needs of educators.

(2) An LEA evaluation system shall identify educators who do not meet expectations for instructional quality and provide support as appropriate at the LEA level which may include providing educators with mentors, coaches, specialists in effective instruction and setting timelines and benchmarks to assist educators toward greater improved instructional effectiveness and student achievement.

F. Records and documentation of required educator evaluation information:

(1) An LEA evaluation system shall include the evaluation of all licensed educators at least once a year.

(2) An LEA evaluation system shall provide at least an annual rating for each licensed educator, including teachers, school administrators and other non-teaching licensed positions, using Board-directed statewide evaluation terminology and definitions.

(3) An LEA evaluation system shall provide for the evaluation of all provisional educators, as defined by the LEA under Section 53A-8a-405, at least twice yearly.

(4) An LEA evaluation system shall include the following specific educator performance criteria:

(a) instructional quality measures to be determined by the LEA;

(b) student growth score to be completely phased in by July 1, 2015; and

(c) other measures as determined by the LEA including data gathered from student/parent input.

(5) the Board shall determine weightings for specific educator performance criteria to be used in the LEA's evaluation system.

(6) An LEA evaluation system shall include a plan for recognizing educators who demonstrate exemplary professional effectiveness, at least in part, by student achievement.

(7) An LEA evaluation system shall identify potential employment consequences, including discipline and termination, if an educator fails to meet performance expectations.

(8) An LEA evaluation system shall include a review or appeals [process]procedure for an educator to challenge the [conclusions]process of a summative evaluation that provides for adequate and timely due process for the educator consistent with Section 53A-8a-406(2).

G. An LEA may include additional components in an evaluation system.

H. A local board of education shall review and approve an LEA's proposed evaluation system in an open meeting prior to the local board's submission to the Board for review and approval.

 

KEY: educators, evaluations, requirements

Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: [November 8, 2012]2013

Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: Art X Sec 3; 53A-1-402(1)(a)(i); 53A-1-401(3)

 

---