No. 27817 (Amendment): R317-1-7. TMDLs

DAR File No.: 27817
Filed: 04/14/2005, 05:20
Received by: NL

 

RULE ANALYSIS

Purpose of the rule or reason for the change:

The purpose of this amendment is to incorporate by reference eight completed and approved Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) into the rule.

 

Summary of the rule or change:

This section incorporates by reference eight completed and approved TMDLs into the rule. Each TMDL document has gone through an individual public review process, have been approved by EPA, and adopted by the Utah Water Quality Board.

 

State statutory or constitutional authorization for this rule:

Section 19-5-104

 

This rule or change incorporates by reference the following material:

San Pitch River TMDL, November 18, 2003; Newton Creek TMDL, June 24, 2004; Panguitch Lake TMDL, June 24, 2004; West Colorado TMDL, August 4, 2004; Silver Creek TMDL, August 4, 2004; Upper Sevier River TMDL, August 4, 2004; Lower and Middle Sevier River TMDL, August 17, 2004; and Lower Colorado River TMDL, September 20, 2004

 

Anticipated cost or savings to:

the state budget:

There are no anticipated impacts to the state budget. The proposed amendments will be addressed using existing resources.

 

local governments:

No cost impacts to local governments are anticipated. However, individual TMDLs may or may not result in capital construction costs or costs associated with changes in management strategies to address point sources and nonpoint source pollution problems. If increased compliance costs to local governments are identified as a result of a TMDL they are presented to the public for comment and discussion prior to the adoption of the TMDL.

 

other persons:

No anticipated cost to other persons are anticipated. However, individual TMDLs may or may not result in capital construction costs or costs associated with changes in management strategies to address point sources and nonpoint source pollution problems. If increased compliance costs to other persons are identified as a result of a TMDL, they are presented to the public for comment and discussion prior to the adoption of the TMDL.

 

Compliance costs for affected persons:

TMDLs may or may not result in capital construction costs or costs associated with changes in management strategies to address point sources and nonpoint source pollution problems. If increased compliance costs to individuals or local governments are identified as a result of a TMDL, they are presented to the public for comment and discussion prior to the adoption of the TMDL.

 

Comments by the department head on the fiscal impact the rule may have on businesses:

Each state is required under Section 303 of the federal Clean Water Act to establish TMDLs for waters identified as impaired, i.e., those waters included on the 303(d) list. States must complete and implement TMDLs. Fiscal impacts to businesses that may result from TMDL implementation, if any, will be declared and discussed in public forums during the development of individual TMDLs. Dianne Nielson, Executive Director

 

The full text of this rule may be inspected, during regular business hours, at the Division of Administrative Rules, or at:

Environmental Quality
Water Quality
CANNON HEALTH BLDG
288 N 1460 W
SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116-3231

 

Direct questions regarding this rule to:

Dave Wham at the above address, by phone at 801-538-6052, by FAX at 801-538-6016, or by Internet E-mail at [e-mail]

 

Interested persons may present their views on this rule by submitting written comments to the address above no later than 5:00 p.m. on:

05/31/2005

 

This rule may become effective on:

06/01/2005

 

Authorized by:

Dianne R. Nielson, Executive Director

 

 

RULE TEXT

R317. Environmental Quality, Water Quality.

R317-1. Definitions and General Requirements.

R317-1-7. TMDLs.

The following TMDLs are approved by the Board and hereby incorporated by reference into these rules:

7.1 Bear River -- December 23, 1997

7.2 Chalk Creek -- December 23, 1997

7.3 Otter Creek -- December 23, 1997

7.4 Little Bear River -- May 23, 2000

7.5 Mantua Reservoir -- May 23, 2000

7.6 East Canyon Creek -- September 1, 2000

7.7 East Canyon Reservoir -- September 1, 2000

7.8 Kents Lake -- September 1, 2000

7.9 LaBaron Reservoir -- September 1, 2000

7.10 Minersville Reservoir -- September 1, 2000

7.11 Puffer Lake -- September 1, 2000

7.12 Scofield Reservoir -- September 1, 2000

7.13 Onion Creek (near Moab) -- July 25, 2002

7.14 Cottonwood Wash -- September 9, 2002

7.15 Deer Creek Reservoir -- September 9, 2002

7.16 Hyrum Reservoir -- September 9, 2002

7.17 Little Cottonwood Creek -- September 9, 2002

7.18 Lower Bear River -- September 9, 2002

7.19 Malad River -- September 9, 2002

7.20 Mill Creek (near Moab) -- September 9, 2002

7.21 Spring Creek -- September 9, 2002

7.22 Forsyth Reservoir -- September 27, 2002

7.23 Johnson Valley Reservoir -- September 27, 2002

7.24 Lower Fremont River -- September 27, 2002

7.25 Mill Meadow Reservoir -- September 27, 2002

7.26 UM Creek -- September 27, 2002

7.27 Upper Fremont River -- September 27, 2002

7.28 Deep Creek -- October 9, 2002

7.29 Uinta River -- October 9, 2002

7.30 Pineview Reservoir -- December 9, 2002

7.31 Browne Lake -- February 19, 2003

7.32 San Pitch River -- November 18, 2003

7.33 Newton Creek -- June 24, 2004

7.34 Panguitch Lake -- June 24, 2004

7.35 West Colorado -- August 4, 2004

7.36 Silver Creek -- August 4, 2004

7.37 Upper Sevier River -- August 4, 2004

7.38 Lower and Middle Sevier River -- August 17,2004

7.39 Lower Colorado River -- September 20, 2004

 

KEY: water pollution, waste disposal, industrial waste, effluent standards

[March 29, 2004]2005

Notice of Continuation October 7, 2002

19-5