No. 29671: R307-342. Ozone Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas: Qualification of Contractors and Test Procedures for Vapor Recovery Systems for Gasoline Delivery Tanks

DAR File No.: 29671
Filed: 03/15/2007, 07:46
Received by: NL

NOTICE OF REVIEW AND STATEMENT OF CONTINUATION

Concise explanation of the particular statutory provisions under which the rule is enacted and how these provisions authorize or require the rule:

Rule R307-342 establishes the requirements for the qualification of contractors to perform vapor tightness tests on gasoline transport vehicles equipped with vapor recovery equipment. The rule is required under the state implementation plan for ozone that is incorporated by reference under Section R307-110-13. The plan is required by the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7410, to maintain the federal health standard for ozone. Subsection 19-2-104(1)(a) authorizes the Air Quality Board to make rules "...regarding the control, abatement, and prevention of air pollution from all sources and the establishment of the maximum quantity of air contaminants that may be emitted by any air contaminants source...." Subsection 19-2-101(2) states "It is the policy of this state and the purpose of this chapter to achieve and maintain levels of air quality which will protect human health and safety...."

Summary of written comments received during and since the last five-year review of the rule from interested persons supporting or opposing the rule:

Rule R307-342 was amended once since its last five-year review (under DAR No. 29011, effective 01/16/2007). One comment was received. COMMENT: In Subsections R307-327-7(3), R307-328-8(3), R307-335-7(3), R307-340-16(3), and R307-342-7(3): the same comment for all; the first sentence should be changed to read "...or approved by the Executive Secretary after obtaining concurrence from EPA" (Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)). RESPONSE: In all these rules the process that must be followed, before a source could use alternate monitoring methodology, is described in an earlier paragraph. It is not necessary to repeat the reference to EPA concurrence again. The current language was approved by EPA and has been effective. No other comments were received about this rule since the last review.

Reasoned justification for continuation of the rule, including reasons why the agency disagrees with comments in opposition to the rule, if any:

The rule is required under the state implementation plan for ozone, incorporated by reference under Section R307-110-13. The plan is required under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7410; without the state plan, EPA would be required to impose a Federal Implementation Plan. Therefore, this rule should be continued.

The full text of this rule may be inspected, during regular business hours, at the Division of Administrative Rules, or at:

Environmental Quality
Air Quality
150 N 1950 W
SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116-3085

Direct questions regarding this rule to:

Mat E. Carlile at the above address, by phone at 801-536-4136, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by Internet E-mail at [e-mail]

Authorized by:

M. Cheryl Heying, Planning Branch Manager