DAR File No.: 32288
Filed: 01/08/2009, 10:03
Received by: NLRULE ANALYSIS
Purpose of the rule or reason for the change:
This emergency rule establishes party responsible for transcription productions costs.
Summary of the rule or change:
This filing requires appellants to be responsible for entire transcription production costs. (DAR NOTE: A corresponding amendment is under DAR No. 32290 in this issue, February 1, 2009, of the Bulletin.)
State statutory or constitutional authorization for this rule:
Section 67-19a-203 and Subsection 67-19a-407(1)
Anticipated cost or savings to:
the state budget:
This change will produce a $3,000 - $4,000 annual saving for the CSRB.
local governments:
None--The CSRB has no interaction with local governments.
small businesses and persons other than businesses:
Individuals or state departments appealing evidentiary/Step 5 decisions will now be required to pay all transcription production costs.
Compliance costs for affected persons:
Individuals or state departments appealing evidentiary/Step 5 decisions will now be required to pay all transcription production costs.
Comments by the department head on the fiscal impact the rule may have on businesses:
As set forth above, this amendment will result in a cost saving to the CSRB of $3,000 to $4,000, annually. It is necessitated by legislative budgetary cuts imposed during the fiscal year 2009 interim session. Robert W. Thompson, Administrator
Emergency rule reason and justification:
Regular rulemaking procedures would cause an imminent budget reduction because of budget restraints or federal requirements.
Budget constraints necessitate that transcription production costs no longer be shared with the Career Service Review Board (CSRB). This amendment will result in a cost savings of between 1% and 2% of total agency expenses.
The full text of this rule may be inspected, during regular business hours, at the Division of Administrative Rules, or at:
Career Service Review Board
Administration
Room 1120 STATE OFFICE BLDG
450 N MAIN ST
SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114-1201Direct questions regarding this rule to:
Robert W. Thompson at the above address, by phone at 801-538-3047, by FAX at 801-538-3139, or by Internet E-mail at bthompson@utah.gov
Interested persons may present their views on this rule by submitting written comments to the address above no later than 5:00 p.m. on:
This rule is effective on:
01/08/2009
Authorized by:
Robert W. Thompson, Administrator
RULE TEXT
R137. Career Service Review Board, Administration.
R137-1. Grievance Procedure Rules.
R137-1-22. The Board's Appellate/Step 6 Procedures.
(1) Transcript Production. The party appealing the CSRB hearing officer's evidentiary/step 5 decision to the board at the appellate/step 6 level shall order transcription of the evidentiary/step 5 hearing from the court reporting firm within ten working days upon receipt of acknowledgment of the appeal from the administrator.
(a) [
The a]Appellants shall be responsible for all transcription production costs[share an equal fee payment with the CSRB Office to the court reporting firm. Transcript production cost-sharing applies equally only to the appellant and to the CSRB Office]. The CSRB Office receives the transcript original; the appellant receives a transcript copy.(b) The respondent may inquire of the CSRB Office about obtaining a transcript copy, or may directly purchase a copy from the court reporting firm.
(2) Briefs. An appeal hearing before the board at step 6 is based upon the evidentiary record previously established by the CSRB hearing officer during the evidentiary/step 5 hearing. No additional or new evidence is permitted unless compelled by the board.
(a) The appellant in an appellate/step 6 proceeding must obtain the transcript of the evidentiary/step 5 hearing. After receipt of the transcript, the appellant has 30 calendar days to file an original and six copies of a brief with the administrator. Additionally, the respondent must be provided with a copy of the appellant's brief.
(b) After receiving a copy of the appellant's brief, the respondent then has 30 calendar days to file an original and six copies of a brief with the administrator. The appellant may file an original and six copies of a reply brief which addresses the respondent's brief.
(c) After receiving both parties' briefs, the administrator distributes the briefs and the CSRB hearing officer's evidentiary/step 5 decision to the board members.
(d) Each party is responsible for filing its original and six copies with the CSRB Office and for exchanging a copy with the opposing party.
(e) Briefs shall be date-stamped upon their receipt in the CSRB Office.
(f) The time frame for receiving briefs shall be modified or waived only for good cause as determined by the CSRB chair or vice-chair, or the administrator.
(3) Rules of Procedure. The following rules are applicable to appeal hearings before the board at the appellate/step 6 level:
(a) Dismissal of Appeal. Upon a motion by either party or upon its own motion, the board may dismiss any appeal prior to holding a formal appeal hearing if the appeal is clearly moot, without merit, improperly filed, untimely filed, or outside the scope of the board's authority.
(b) Notice. The board shall distribute written notice of the date, time, place, and issues for hearing to the aggrieved employee, to the employee's counsel or representative, to the appropriate agency official, to the agency's counsel or representative, and to the agency's management representative, at least five working days before the date set for the hearing.
(c) Compelling Evidence. The board may compel evidence in the conduct of its appeal hearings, according to Subsection 67-19a-202(3).
(d) Oral Argument/Time Limitation. The board grants up to 20 to 25 minutes to each party for oral argument. The board may grant additional time when deemed appropriate.
(e) Oral Argument Set Aside. If the board determines that oral argument is unnecessary, the parties shall be notified. However, the parties' representatives may be expected to appear before the board at the date, time, and place noticed to answer any questions raised by the board members.
(f) Argument or Memoranda. The board may require the parties to offer oral argument or submit written memoranda of law.
(4) The Board's Standards of Review. The board's standards of review based upon the following criteria:
(a) The board shall first make a determination of whether the factual findings of the CSRB hearing officer are reasonable and rational according to the substantial evidence standard. When the board determines that the factual findings of the CSRB hearing officer are not reasonable and rational based on the evidentiary/step 5 record as a whole, then the board may, in its discretion, correct the factual findings, and also make new or additional factual findings.
(b) Once the board has either determined that the factual findings of the CSRB hearing officer are reasonable and rational or has corrected the factual findings based upon the evidentiary/step 5 record as a whole, the board must then determine whether the CSRB hearing officer has correctly applied the relevant policies, rules, and statutes according to the correctness standard, with no deference being granted to the evidentiary/step 5 decision of the CSRB hearing officer.
(c) Finally, the board must determine whether the decision of the CSRB hearing officer, including the totality of the sanctions imposed by the agency, is reasonable and rational based upon the ultimate factual findings and correct application of relevant policies, rules, and statutes determined according to the above provisions.
(5) Appeal Hearing Record. The proceeding before the board shall be recorded by a certified court reporter, or in exceptional circumstances by a recording machine.
(6) Appellate Review. Upon a party's application for review of the CSRB hearing officer's evidentiary/step 5 decision, the board's appellate/step 6 decision is based upon a review of the record, including briefs and oral arguments presented at step 6, and no further evidentiary hearing will be held unless otherwise ordered by the board. Section 63G-4[
6b]-[10]208 of the UAPA is incorporated by reference.(7) Remand. Until the board's decision is final, the board may remand the case to the original CSRB hearing officer to take additional evidence or to resolve any further evidentiary issues of fact or law with instructions or may make any other appropriate disposition of the appeal.
(8) Distribution of Appellate Decisions. The board's decision and order is issued on the date that it is signed and dated by the CSRB chair, vice-chair or another board member. After the board's appellate/step 6 decision is issued, it is distributed according to R137-1-8(3).
(a) The board's appellate decision shall be distributed to the aggrieved employee, the employee's counsel or representative, the appropriate agency official, the agency's counsel or representative, and to the agency's management representative. The board's appellate decision shall be final in terms of administrative review under these grievance procedures. The board may, at its discretion, release to the parties its determination orally prior to issuance of its official written decision.
(b) The board's appellate decision is binding on the agency that is a party to the appeal unless its decision and ruling is overturned, vacated, or modified resulting from an appeal to the Utah Court of Appeals.
(c) The board may affirm, reverse, adopt, modify, supplement, amend, or vacate the CSRB hearing officer's decision, either in whole or in part.
(9) Rehearings. The board does not permit rehearings.
(10) Reconsideration.
(a) Reconsideration requests of the board's appellate/step 6 decisions will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of Section 63G-4[
6b]-[13]302.(b) Any request for reconsideration of a previously issued decision by the board is subject to the following conditions:
(i) Reconsideration requests must contain specific reasons why a reconsideration is warranted with respect to the board's factual findings and legal conclusions.
(ii) The board has discretion to decide whether it may reconsider any previously adjudicated matter.
(iii) The board only grants a reconsideration if appropriate justification is offered.
(iv) When the board agrees to the petitioner's request, the board's reconsideration response is in writing, with no further hearing or proceeding on the record, unless the board reopens the record or remands the case to the evidentiary/step 5 level.
(v) Any appeal from a board-issued reconsideration to the Utah Court of Appeals must be filed according to Section 63G-4[
6b]-[14]401(3)(a)of the UAPA.(11) An Appeal to the Utah Court of Appeals.
To appeal to the Utah Court of Appeals, a party must file with the court within 30 calendar days from the date of issuance of the board's decision and final agency action according to Sections 63G-4[
6b]-[14]401 and 63G-4[6b]-[16]403 of the UAPA, which are incorporated by reference. The dates of mailing, postmarking and receipt are not applicable to filing with the court.(12) Transcript Fee. The party petitioning the Utah Court of Appeals for a review must bear all costs of transcript production for the appellate/step 6 proceeding. The CSRB Office may not share any cost for a transcript or transcription of the appeal hearing. The petitioning party should provide a copy of the appeal hearing's transcript to the responding party when an appellate/step 6 proceeding is transcribed.
KEY: grievance procedures
Date of Enactment or last Substantive Amendment: January 8, 2009
Notice of Continuation: August 4, 2006
Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 34A-5-106; 67-19-30; 67-19-31; 67-19-32; 67-19a et seq.; 63G-4[
6b] et seq.
Document Information
- Effective Date:
- 1/8/2009
- Publication Date:
- 02/01/2009
- Filed Date:
- 01/08/2009
- Agencies:
- Career Service Review Office,Administration
- Rulemaking Authority:
Section 67-19a-203 and Subsection 67-19a-407(1)
- Authorized By:
- Robert W. Thompson, Administrator
- DAR File No.:
- 32288
- Related Chapter/Rule NO.: (1)
- R137-1-22. The Board's Appellate/Step 6 Procedures.