DAR File No.: 27656
Filed: 01/14/2005, 04:03
Received by: NLRULE ANALYSIS
Purpose of the rule or reason for the change:
The proposed amendments are being made to bring all the R317 rules into conformity with the changing from "Total Coliform" or "Fecal Coliform" bacteria to "E. coli" in Rule R317-2 entitled Standards of Quality for Waters of the State. (DAR NOTE: The proposed amendment to Rule R317-2 was published in the January 1, 2005, issue of the Utah State Bulletin under DAR No. 27593.)
Summary of the rule or change:
"Total Coliform" or "Fecal Coliform" bacteria and their associated numeric criteria are changed to (or augmented with) "E. coli" and its associated numeric criteria.
State statutory or constitutional authorization for this rule:
Section 19-5-104
Anticipated cost or savings to:
the state budget:
There are no anticipated costs or savings to state budget. The proposed amendments change one method of measuring bacteria for another. The costs of the current and proposed analysis methods are substantially the same.
local governments:
The proposed amendments change one method of measuring bacteria for another. The costs of the current and proposed analysis methods are substantially the same. There are no anticipated costs or savings to local government.
other persons:
The proposed amendments change one method of measuring bacteria for another. The costs of the current and proposed analysis methods are substantially the same. There are no anticipated costs or savings to other persons.
Compliance costs for affected persons:
There are no anticipated additional compliance costs for affected persons. The proposed amendments change one method of measuring bacteria for another. The costs of the current and proposed analysis methods are substantially the same.
Comments by the department head on the fiscal impact the rule may have on businesses:
There are no anticipated additional compliance costs for affected businesses. The proposed amendments change one method of measuring bacteria for another. The costs of the current and proposed analysis methods are substantially the same.
The full text of this rule may be inspected, during regular business hours, at the Division of Administrative Rules, or at:
Environmental Quality
Water Quality
CANNON HEALTH BLDG
288 N 1460 W
SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116-3231Direct questions regarding this rule to:
Dave Wham at the above address, by phone at 801-538-6052, by FAX at 801-538-6016, or by Internet E-mail at dwham@utah.gov
Interested persons may present their views on this rule by submitting written comments to the address above no later than 5:00 p.m. on:
03/11/2005
Interested persons may attend a public hearing regarding this rule:
3/02/2005 at 7:00 PM, City Library, 303 N 100 E, West Room, Cedar City, UT and 3/04/2005 at 3:00 PM, Cannon Heath Building, 288 N 1460 W, Room 125, Salt Lake City, UT
This rule may become effective on:
04/01/2005
Authorized by:
Dianne R. Nielson, Executive Director
RULE TEXT
R317. Environmental Quality, Water Quality.
R317-10. Certification of Wastewater Works Operators.
R317-10-6. Facility Classification System.
Treatment plants and collection systems shall be classified in accordance with Table 1.
TABLE 1
FACILITY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
FACILITY CLASS
CATEGORY I II III IV
Collection Pop. 3,500 3,501 to 15,001 to 50,001 and
(1) Served and less 15,000 50,000 greater
Treatment Range 30 and 31 to 55 56 to 75 76 and
Plant (2) of Fac. less greater
Points
Small Design 3,500 and less
Lagoon Pop.
Systems(3) Equiv.
(1) Simple "in-line" treatment (such as booster pumping,
preventive chlorination, or odor control) is considered an
integral part of a collection system.
(2) Treatment plants shall be assigned "facility points"
in accordance with Table 2 "Wastewater Treatment Plant
Classification System".
(3) A combined certificate shall be issued for treatment
works/collection system operation.TABLE 2
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
Each Unit process should have points assigned only once.
Item Points
SIZE (2 PT Minimum - 20 PT Maximum)
Max. Population equivalent (PE) served, 1 - 10
peak day(1)
Design flow average day or peak month average, 1 - 10
whichever is larger(2)
VARIATION IN RAW WASTE (3)
Variations do not exceed those normally or 0
typically expected
Recurring deviations or excessive variations of 2
100 - 200% in strength and/or flow
Recurring deviations or excessive variations of 4
more than 200% in strength and/or flow
Raw wastes subject to toxic waste discharges 6
Acceptance of septage or truck-hauled waste 2
PRELIMINARY TREATMENT
Plant pumping of main flow 3
Screening, comminution 3
Grit removal 3
Equalization 1
PRIMARY TREATMENT
Clarifiers 5
Imhoff tanks or similar 5
SECONDARY TREATMENT
Fixed film reactor 10
Activated sludge 15
Stabilization ponds w/o aeration 5
Stabilization ponds w/aeration 8
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Polishing ponds for advanced waste treatment 2
Chemical/physical advanced waste treatment w/o 15
secondary
Chemical/physical advanced waste treatment 10
following secondary
Biological or chemical/biological advanced waste 12
treatment
Nitrification by designed extended aeration only 2
Ion exchange for advanced waste treatment 10
Reverse osmosis, electrodialysis and other 15
membrane filtration techniques
Advanced waste treatment chemical recovery, carbon 4
regeneration
Media Filtration 5
ADDITIONAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
Chemical additions (2 pts./each for max. of 6 pts.) 2 - 6
Dissolved air flotation (for other than sludge
thickening) 8
Intermittent sand filter 2
Recirculating intermittent sand filter 3
Microscreens 5
Generation of oxygen 5
SOLIDS HANDLING
Solids conditioning 2
Solids thickening (based on technology) 2 - 5
Mechanical dewatering 8
Anaerobic digestion of solids 10
Utilization of digester gas for heating 5
or cogeneration
Aerobic digestion of solids 6
Evaporative sludge drying 2
Solids reduction (including incineration, wet 12
oxidation)
On-site landfill for solids 2
Solids composting 10
Land application of biosolids by contractor 2
Land application of biosolids under direction 10
of facility operator in DRC
DISINFECTION (10 pt. max.)
Chlorination or ultraviolet irradiation 5
Ozonation 10
EFFLUENT DISCHARGE (10 pt. max.)
Mechanical Post aeration 2
Direct recycle and reuse 6
Land treatment and disposal (surface or subsurface) 4
INSTRUMENTATION (6 pt. max.)
Use of SCADA or similar instrumentation systems
to provide data with no process operation 0
Use of SCADA or similar instrumentation systems
to provide data with limited process operation 2
Use of SCADA or similar instrumentation systems
to provide data with moderate process operation 4
Use of SCADA or similar instrumentation systems
to provide data with extensive/total process operation 6
LABORATORY CONTROL (15 pt. max)(4)
Bacteriological/biological (5 pt. max):
Lab work done outside the plant 0
Membrane filter procedures 3
Use of fermentation tubes or any dilution 5
method ([fecal coliform]or E. coli determination)
Chemical/physical (10 pt. max):
Lab work done outside the plant 0
Push-button, visual methods for simple tests 3
(i.e. pH, settleable solids)
Additional procedures (ie, DO, COD, BOD, gas 5
analysis, titrations, solids volatile
content)
More advanced determinations (ie, specific 7
constituents; nutrients, total oils,
phenols)
Highly sophisticated instrumentation (i.e., 10
atomic absorption, gas chromatography)
(1) 1 point per 10,000 P.E. or part; maximum of 10 points
(2) 1 point per MGD or part
(3) Key concept is frequency and/or intensity of
deviation or excessive variation from normal or typical
fluctuations; such deviation may be in terms of strength,
toxicity, shock loads, inflow and infiltration, with point
values ranging from 0 - 6.
(4) Key concept is to credit laboratory analyses done
on-site by plant personnel under the direction of the operator
in direct responsible charge with point values ranging
from 0 - 15.KEY: water pollution, operator certification, wastewater treatment
[
June 23, 2004]2005Notice of Continuation October 7, 2002
19-5
Document Information
- Effective Date:
- 4/1/2005
- Publication Date:
- 02/01/2005
- Filed Date:
- 01/14/2005
- Agencies:
- Environmental Quality,Water Quality
- Rulemaking Authority:
Section 19-5-104
- Authorized By:
- Dianne R. Nielson, Executive Director
- DAR File No.:
- 27656
- Related Chapter/Rule NO.: (1)
- R317-10-6. Facility Classification System.