(Amendment)
DAR File No.: 41026
Filed: 11/17/2016 04:33:35 PMRULE ANALYSIS
Purpose of the rule or reason for the change:
The part of the statute on which this rule amendment is based was used for the first time this spring. Creating a deadline for written statements will standardize the way the Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission (JPEC) collects them from judges.
Summary of the rule or change:
The rule amendment imposes a due date for written statements on judges eligible to provide one to JPEC.
Statutory or constitutional authorization for this rule:
- Section 78A-12-206
Anticipated cost or savings to:
the state budget:
The change has no impact on the state budget because it only imposes a deadline on judges for submission of written statements.
local governments:
The change has no impact on local governments because it only imposes a deadline on judges for submission of written statements.
small businesses:
The commission has no authority with respect to small businesses and no dealings with small businesses; consequently, there is no impact on such entities.
persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local governmental entities:
The only affected persons are the judges who are eligible to submit a written statement to JPEC, pursuant to Subsection 78A-12-206(3).
Compliance costs for affected persons:
This rule amendment imposes a deadline. There are no associated compliance costs.
Comments by the department head on the fiscal impact the rule may have on businesses:
It is my opinion that application of this amendment will not create any fiscal impact.
John Ashton, Commission Chair
The full text of this rule may be inspected, during regular business hours, at the Office of Administrative Rules, or at:
Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission
Administration
Room B-330 SENATE BUILDING
420 N STATE ST
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114Direct questions regarding this rule to:
- Jennifer Yim at the above address, by phone at , by FAX at , or by Internet E-mail at jyim@utah.gov
Interested persons may present their views on this rule by submitting written comments to the address above no later than 5:00 p.m. on:
01/17/2017
This rule may become effective on:
01/24/2017
Authorized by:
John Ashton, Chair
RULE TEXT
R597. Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission, Administration.
R597-3. Judicial Performance Evaluations.
R597-3-8. Judicial Written Statements.
If, pursuant to Utah Code Ann. Subsection 78A-12-206(3), a judge is eligible to provide a written statement to be included in the judge's evaluation report, the statement shall be due to commission staff, in writing, no later than one week after the deadline for the judge to file a declaration of the judge's candidacy in the retention election.
KEY: judicial performance evaluations, judges, evaluation cycles, surveys
Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: [
April 20, 2016]2017Notice of Continuation: February 17, 2014
Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 78A-12
Document Information
- Effective Date:
- 1/24/2017
- Publication Date:
- 12/15/2016
- Type:
- Notices of Proposed Rules
- Filed Date:
- 11/17/2016
- Agencies:
- Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission, Administration
- Rulemaking Authority:
Section 78A-12-206
- Authorized By:
- John Ashton, Chair
- DAR File No.:
- 41026
- Summary:
The rule amendment imposes a due date for written statements on judges eligible to provide one to JPEC.
- CodeNo:
- R597-3-8
- CodeName:
- Judicial Written Statements
- Link Address:
- Judicial Performance Evaluation CommissionAdministrationRoom B-330 SENATE BUILDING420 N STATE STSALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114
- Link Way:
Jennifer Yim, by phone at , by FAX at , or by Internet E-mail at jyim@utah.gov
- AdditionalInfo:
- More information about a Notice of Proposed Rule is available online. The Portable Document Format (PDF) version of the Bulletin is the official version. The PDF version of this issue is available at http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bull-pdf/2016/b20161215.pdf. The HTML edition of the Bulletin is a convenience copy. Any discrepancy between the PDF version and HTML version is resolved in favor of the PDF version. Text to be deleted is struck through and surrounded by brackets ([example]). ...
- Related Chapter/Rule NO.: (1)
- R597-3-8. Judicial Written Statements