No. 35610 (Amendment): Rule R131-13. Health Reform -- Health Insurance Coverage in State Contracts -- Implementation

(Amendment)

DAR File No.: 35610
Filed: 01/03/2012 03:37:38 PM

RULE ANALYSIS

Purpose of the rule or reason for the change:

The purpose of this rule is to comply with the new provisions of Section 63C-9-403 enacted by H.B. 128 of the 2011 General Session and state statutes.

Summary of the rule or change:

H.B. 128 of the 2011 General Session amended the benchmark requirements for health insurance coverage in state contracts. Other changes to the rule are to comply with state statutes. (DAR NOTE: A corresponding 120-day (emergency) rule filing for Rule R131-13 is under DAR No. 35611, effective 01/03/2012, in this issue, January 15, 2012, of the Bulletin.)

State statutory or constitutional authorization for this rule:

• Section 63C-9-403

Anticipated cost or savings to:

the state budget:

Enactment of this amendment simply complies with state statute and has no fiscal impact.

local governments:

No cost or savings are anticipated for local governments with this amendment to the rule. No new requirements were created with this amendment that impact local governments.

small businesses:

Enactment of this amendment simply complies with state statute and has no fiscal impact.

persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local governmental entities:

Enactment of this amendment simply complies with state statute and has no fiscal impact.

Compliance costs for affected persons:

Enactment of this amendment simply complies with state statute and has no fiscal impact.

Comments by the department head on the fiscal impact the rule may have on businesses:

As stated, the statute itself created any fiscal impacts. The amendment to this rule does not add additional burdens than already provided by the statute. This rule by itself will not have a fiscal impact on businesses because it merely reiterates the statutory requirements.

Allyson Gamble, Executive Director

The full text of this rule may be inspected, during regular business hours, at the Division of Administrative Rules, or at:

Capitol Preservation Board (State)
Administration
Room E110 EAST BUILDING
420 N STATE ST
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-2110

Direct questions regarding this rule to:

• Alan Bachman at the above address, by phone at 801-538-3105, by FAX at 801-538-3313, or by Internet E-mail at [e-mail]
• Allyson Gamble at the above address, by phone at 801-537-9156, by FAX at 801-538-3221, or by Internet E-mail at [e-mail]
• Chiarina Gleed at the above address, by phone at 801-538-3240, by FAX at 801-538-3313, or by Internet E-mail at [e-mail]

Interested persons may present their views on this rule by submitting written comments to the address above no later than 5:00 p.m. on:

02/14/2012

This rule may become effective on:

02/21/2012

Authorized by:

Allyson Gamble, Executive Director

RULE TEXT

R131. Capitol Preservation Board (State), Administration.

R131-13. Health Reform -- Health Insurance Coverage in State Contracts -- Implementation.

R131-13-1. Purpose.

The purpose of this rule is to comply with the provisions of Section 63C-9-403.

 

R131-13-2. Authority.

This rule is authorized under Subsection 63C-9-301(3)(a) whereby the Capitol Preservation Board may make rules to govern, administer, and regulate the capitol hill complex, capitol hill facilities, and capitol hill grounds by following the procedures and requirements of Title 63G, Chapter 3, Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act, as well as Section 63C-9-403 that requires this rule related to health insurance provisions in certain design and construction contracts.

 

R131-13-3. Definitions.

(1) Except as otherwise stated in this rule, terms used in this rule are defined in Section 63C-9-403.

(2) In addition:

(a) "Board" means the Capitol Preservation Board established pursuant to Section 63C-9-201.

(b) "Executive Director" means the executive director of the Capitol Preservation Board including, unless otherwise stated, the executive director's duly authorized designee.

(c) "Employee(s)" [is as defined in Subsection 63C-9-403(1)(a) and includes only those employees that live and work in the state of Utah along with their dependents. "Employee" for purposes of this rule, shall not be construed as to be broader than the use of the term employee for purposes of state of Utah Workers' Compensation laws along with their dependents.]means an "employee," "worker," or "operative" as defined in Section 34A-2-104 who:

(i) works at least 30 hours per calendar week; and

(ii) meets employer eligibility waiting requirements for health care insurance which may not exceed the first day of the calendar month following 90 days from the date of hire.

(d) "State" means the state of Utah.

 

R131-13-4. Applicability of Rule.

(1) Except as provided in Subsection R131-13-4(2) below, R131-13 applies to all design or construction contracts entered into by the Board or the executive director, or on behalf of the Board, on or after July 1, 2009, and

(a) applies to a prime contractor if the prime contract is in the amount of $1,500,000 or greater; and

(b) applies to a subcontractor if the subcontract, at any tier, is in the amount of $750,000 or greater.

(2) Rule R131-13 does not apply if:

(a) the application of this Rule R131-13 jeopardizes the receipt of federal funds;

(b) the contract is a sole source contract; or

(c) the contract is an emergency procurement.

(3) This Rule R131-13 does not apply to a change order as defined in Section 63G-6-103, or a modification to a contract, when the contract does not meet the initial threshold required by Subsection R131-13-4(1).

(4) A person who intentionally uses change orders or contract modifications to circumvent the requirements of Subsection R131-13-4(1) is guilty of an infraction.

 

R131-13-5. Contractor to Comply with Section 63C-9-403.

All contractors and subcontractors that are subject to the requirements of Section 63C-9-403 shall comply with all the requirements, penalties and liabilities of Section 63C-9-403.

 

R131-13-6. Not Basis for Protest or Suspend, Disrupt, or Terminate Design or Construction.

(1) The failure of a contractor or subcontractor to provide qualified health insurance coverage as required by this Rule R131-13 or Section 63C-9-403:

(a) may not be the basis for a protest or other action from a prospective bidder, offeror, or contractor under Section 63G-6-801 or any other provision in Title 63G, Chapter 6, Part 8, Legal and Contractual Remedies; and

(b) may not be used by the procurement entity or a prospective bidder, offeror, or contractor as a basis for any action or suit that would suspend, disrupt or terminate the design or construction.

 

R131-13-7. Requirements and Procedures a Contractor Must Follow.

A contractor, including consultants and designers, must comply with the following requirements and procedures in order to demonstrate compliance with Section 63C-9-403.

(1) Demonstrating Compliance with Health Insurance Requirements. The following requirements must be met by a contractor, including consultants, designers and others under contract with the Board or the executive director that is subject to the requirements of Rule R131-13 no later than the time the contract is entered into or renewed:

(a) demonstrate compliance by a written certification to the executive director that the contractor has and will maintain for the duration of the contract an offer of qualified health insurance coverage for the contractor's employees and the employees' dependents; and

(b) the contractor shall also provide such written certification prior to the execution of the contract, in regard to all subcontractors, including subconsultants, at any tier that are subject to the requirements of Rule R131-13.

(2) Recertification. The executive director shall have the right to request a recertification by the contractor by submitting a written request to the contractor, and the contractor shall so comply with the written request within ten working days of receipt of the written request; however, in no case may the contractor be required to demonstrate such compliance more than twice in any 12-month period.

(3) Demonstrating Compliance with Actuarially Equivalent Determination. The actuarially equivalent determination required by Subsection[s] 63C-9-403(1)(c)[(i) and (iii)] and defined in Section 26-40-115 is met by the contractor if the contractor provides the executive director with a written statement of actuarial equivalency from either the Utah Insurance Department; an actuary selected by the contractor; or the contractor's insurer; or an underwriter who is responsible for developing the employer group's premium rates.

For purposes of this [Subsection]Rule R131-13-7(3), actuarially equivalency is achieved by meeting or exceeding [any of the following:

(a) As]the requirements of Section 26-40-115 which are also delineated on the DFCM website at http://dfcm.utah.gov/downloads/Health%20Insurance%20Benchmark.pdf .[, a health benefit plan and employer contribution level with a combined actuarial value at least actuarially equivalent to the combined actuarial value of the benchmark plan determined by the Children's Health Insurance Program under Subsection 26-40-106(2)(a), and a contribution level of 50% of the premium for the employee and the dependents of the employee who reside or work in the State, in which:

(i) The employer pays at least 50% of the premium for the employee and the dependents of the employee who reside or work in the State; and

(ii) for purposes of calculating actuarial equivalency under this Subsection R131-13-7(3)(a):

(A) rather than the benchmark plan's deductible, and the benchmark plan's out-of-pocket maximum based on income levels, the deductible is $750 per individual and $2,250 per family; and the out-of-pocket maximum is $3,000 per individual and $9,000 per family;

(B) dental coverage is not required; and

(C) other than Subsection 26-40-106(2)(a), the provisions of Section 26-40-106 do not apply; or

(b)(i) is a federally qualified high deductible health plan that, at a minimum, has a deductible that is either;

(A) the lowest deductible permitted for a federally qualified high deductible health plan; or

(B) a deductible that is higher than the lowest deductible permitted for a federally qualified high deductible health plan, but includes an employer contribution to a health savings account in a dollar amount at least equal to the dollar amount difference between the lowest deductible permitted for a federally qualified high deductible plan and the deductible for the employer offered federally qualified high deductible plan;

(ii) an out-of pocket maximum that does not exceed three times the amount of the annual deductible; and

(iii) under which the employer pays 75% of the premium for the employee and the dependents of the employee who work or reside in the State.]

(4) The health insurance must be available upon the first day of the calendar month following [the initial] ninety days from the date of hire.

(5) Architect and Engineer Compliance Process. Architects and engineers that are subject to Rule R131-13 must demonstrate compliance with Rule R131-13 in any annual submittal. During the procurement process and no later than the execution of the contract with the architect or engineer, the architect or engineer shall confirm that their applicable subcontractors or subconsultants meet the requirements of Rule R131-13.

(6) General (Prime) Contractors Compliance Process. Contractors that are subject to Rule R131-13 must demonstrate compliance with Rule R131-13 for their own firm and any applicable subcontractors, in any pre-qualification process that may be used for the procurement. At the time of execution of the contract, the contractor shall confirm that their applicable subcontractors or subconsultants meet the requirements of Rule R131-13.

(7) Notwithstanding any prequalification process, any contract subject to Rule R131-13 shall contain a provision requiring compliance with Rule R131-13 from the time of execution and throughout the duration of the contract.

(8) Hearing and Penalties.

(a) Hearing. Any hearing for any penalty under Rule R131-13 conducted by the Board or executive director shall be conducted in the same manner as any hearing required for a suspension or debarment.

(b) Penalties that may be [I]imposed by the Board or Executive Director. The penalties that may be imposed by the Board or executive director if a contractor, consultant, subcontractor or subconsultant, at any tier, intentionally violates the provisions of Rule R131-13 may include:

(i) a three-month suspension of the contractor or subcontractor from entering into future contracts with the State upon the first violation, regardless of which tier the contractor or subcontractor is involved with the future design and/or construction contract;

(ii) a six-month suspension of the contractor or subcontractor from entering into future contracts with the State upon the second violation, regardless of which tier the contractor or subcontractor is involved with the future design and/or construction contract;

(iii) an action for debarment of the contractor or subcontractor in accordance with Section 63G-6-804 upon the third or subsequent violation; and

(iv) monetary penalties which may not exceed 50% of the amount necessary to purchase qualified health insurance coverage for an employee and dependents of an employee of the contractor or subcontractor who was not offered qualified health insurance coverage during the duration of the contract.

(c)(i) In addition to the penalties imposed above, a contractor, consultant, subcontractor or subconsultant who intentionally violates the provisions of this Rule R131-13 shall be liable to the employee for health care costs that would have been covered by qualified health insurance coverage.

(ii) An employer has an affirmative defense to a cause of action under Subsection R131-13-7(8)(c)(i) as provided in Subsection 63C-9-403(7)(a)(ii).

 

R131-13-8. Not Create any Contractual Relationship with any Subcontractor or Subconsultant.

Nothing in Rule R131-13 shall be construed as to create any contractual relationship whatsoever between the State, the Board, or the executive director with any subcontractor or subconsultant at any tier.

 

KEY: health insurance, contractors, contracts

Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: [September 22, 2010]February 21, 2012

Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 63C-9-403; 63C-9-301(3)(a)

 

---